Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli Tortures in New Jersey.

May 23, 2009 at 10:23 A.M. Computer attacks and harassment makes addition of images impossible at this time. My security system cannot be updated. New Jersey's hackers make it necessary for me to focus on the sex lives of Superior Court judges in essays that are coming up. I will not "stop." I will not "adjust." I will not legitimate the atrocities committed against me and covered-up by the corrupt and/or incompetent Ms. Milgram or Mr. Rabner. I will continue to rub their faces in the excrement that is their state's legal system. Spacing may be affected in this essay by New Jersey's hackers.

I will focus on Ms. Milgram's alleged "lesbian loyalties" (Debbie Poritz?) leading to a betrayal of her oath as N.J. Attorney General. Cyberobstructions and harassment:

February 18, 2009 at 2:17 P.M. and February 26, 2009 at 4:08 P.M. Access difficult.

November 6, 2007 at 1:20 P.M. Access to my sites is blocked. Updating my security system is obstructed. I will run scans all day.

I spent an exhausting several hours coping with hackers and destruction of written work. 826 intrusion attempts on May 30, 2007; 866 on June 1, 2007. I am unable to change the image in my profile, on a regular basis, run a full scan, or navigate easily from one location to another. If more than two days pass without a new post from me, then please believe that my silence will not be voluntary. I will keep trying to access my sites throughout the day. Letters may be deleted or other "errors" inserted in this text at any time. As of July, 2007 I am averaging between 500 and 1,000 intrusion attempts and hacks per day, by my estimate, based on past figures and daily damage to my system. These blogs have been indexed at the following sites:

http://www.indexmaster.com/news.php?item16-36k
http://www.methodman.posters.com/-95k

How is the spacing of paragraphs in this essay? Monica Scislowska, "Newfound Documents Shed Light on Lives of Notorious Death-Camp Doctors," in The Star Ledger, March 23, 2010, at p. 2.

I.

I live in a society that tortures people. I do not mean only that people in secret prisons are tortured. It is becoming increasingly clear that this secret torture must be a matter of policy at some level. Also, ordinary persons in the United States are routinely subjected to horrible physical and psychological tortures in prisons and jails, sometimes in their homes. I live in a society that censors and suppresses political speech. ("How Censorship Works in America" and "Censorship and Cruelty in New Jersey.")

Persons are secretly subjected to questioning under hypnosis and in a drugged condition -- made to endure frustrations and stress for purposes of "observation" -- all of which is clearly illegal under existing U.S. law. They are assaulted, sexually violated, stolen from and worse by government agents acting with apparent authority on behalf of state agencies. The information obtained in this manner is used against them by some state governments -- like New Jersey -- even in civil proceedings, provided that officials can later claim to have obtained the information from some "other" source. They say: "It might have been for your own good." Right, John? OAE? Anne Milgram?

One therapist-torturer explained that he is "a patient advocate." Terry tortures people "for their own good." Do you still make such a claim, Terry? Many victims of psychological torture will not be told the truth concerning what has been done to them nor by whom they have been tortured, or even raped. The reality of harm done to them -- for life -- will be ignored, so long as "plausible denial" (a believable lie) can be maintained by the very authorities who then judge the "ethics" and legality in the actions of victims and others. These liars will insist that others tell the truth. Requests for information will be denied in violation of due process and statutory law.

Once again, publicly, I am requesting any and all reports filed with any and all agencies or entities of New Jersey's government and courts by Terry Tuchin and/or Diana Lisa Riccioli, or by any other so-called expert, at any time, from 1988 to date in which I am mentioned, whether by name or under a pseudonym or code, for whatever purpose or reason, whether such report was filed "secretly" or not, or for any purpose, by any so-called investigator (or anyone on behalf of an investigator or "expert") making use of "expert's information," including all recordings or memorializations in any form whatsoever, created for any purpose whatsover, at any time during that same period, and/or since my last residence date in New Jersey.

"... a group of experts advising the intelligence agencies are arguing that the harsh techniques used since the 2001 terrorist attacks" -- and used secretly well before then! -- "are outmoded, amateurish and unreliable."Scott Shane & Mark Mazetti, "Advisers Fault Harsh Methods In Interrogation," in The New York Times, May 30, 2007, at p. A1. For an updating of these realities, see Philippe Sands, Torture Team: Rumfeld's Memo and the Betrayal of American Values (New York: MacMillan, 2009).

A person experiencing such surrealistic torments is expected to find some way to reconcile long-held political and legal ideals with the reality of daily and cynical betrayals of those ideals by politicians and judges. Ethics? Whose ethics? Is the American legal system a lie?

"... hypnosis might be used to seduce young women ... and individuals under hypnosis might be compromised and blackmailed." Robert Marks, The Search for the Manchurian Candidate: The CIA and Mind Control (New York: Dell, 1988), pp. 194-195 (referring to 16,000 declassified CIA documents and other intelligence sources in the U.S. effort to formulate "mind control" techniques, which have developed substantially since this book was written). See, for example, Rebecca Lemov, World as Laboratory: Experiments With Mice, Mazes, and Men (New York: Hill & Wang, 2005), pp. 71-125 and Alfred W. McCoy, A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror (New York: Henry Holt, 2006), pp. 151-188. (The parallels between the techniques described by detainees at America's secret prisons and methods used illicitly against persons like me, including many African-American revolutionaries, are too many to be coincidental.) Finally, see Assata Shakur, "Prisoner in the United States," in Still Black, Still Strong: Survivors of the War Against Black Revolutionaries (New York & Paris: Columbia-Semiotexte, 1993), pp. 205-220. (" ... trying to turn us against each other, trying to scare them to death so that they would be afraid even to have a relationship with me.")

The partnership between intelligence agencies or tactics and mafia/organized crime methods is understandable and common in parts of the country, especially in crime-infested jurisdictions with plenty of corrupt politicians and bribe-taking judges, such as New Jersey: "Referring to the CIA-mob relationship, author Robert Sam Anson says, 'It was inevitable: Gentlemen wishing to be killers gravitated to killers wishing to be gentlemen.' ..." (p. 204.)

Are these the "gentlemen" admired in New Jersey's legal circles? (See "Jaynee La Vecchia and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

Victims must find a way to keep from throwing up when contemplating overfed types sporting judicial robes over "brand new" suits from Sears, along with shaky and insincere smiles for newspaper cameras in the ultimate example of cognitive dissonance that is now, much too often, the truth concerning many of America's judges. Politicians are no better. In fact, politicians and judges tend to be the same people in Trenton. (See "Peter G. Verniero and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "James R. Zazzali and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

Mr. Sands details the news conference at which Mr. Rumsfeld explained a rationale for the Iraq invasion as the only response to "torture" which "is systematic in Iraq, and the most senior officials of the regime are involved." (Sands, p. 14.) Mr. Rumsfeld made these remarks one day after secretly signing the memo by Mr. Haynes calling for "aggressive interrogation" and "enhanced methods" which amount to identical tortures to those complained of in Iraq. Censorship prevents my use of photographs from Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. If my MSN group still exists, I urge readers to visit that site and examine the photos attached to my posts there. I am prevented from accessing my sites or using images.

In New Jersey -- the worst jurisdiction in the country in terms of corruption and judicial incompetence -- Senator Robert "Bob" Menendez: "... is widely seen as a machine politician from a corrupt urban county." Thomas B. Edsall, "The Menendez Mystery: Jersey Barrier," in The New Republic, October 30, 2006, at p. 10. (New "errors" were inserted and corrected at my msn group today, March 20, 2008 at 12:54 P.M. I will continue to struggle.)

Menendez is "one scandal away from becoming the next Bob Torricelli." Ibid. Members of the state Supreme Court, legislators, local officials and judges -- all swim in the same sewer. Mr. Rabner, you are aware of these tortures and of my daily demand for the truth concerning what has been done to me and by whom it was done. I demand, again, all records of the tortures/"treatment" to which I was subjected, secretly, and recognition of my legal rights. I am making this demand publicly, again, and before the world. I have no confidence in New Jersey's legal institutions or in persons, like yourself, found in those institutions. ("Stuart Rabner and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Law and Ethics in the Soprano State.")

Ethics? In New Jersey? What do you say to yourself, Mr. Rabner, that allows you to live the lie that is your judicial oath under these circumstances? How many others have been tortured in New Jersey's prisons? How many persons are sitting in prisons or hospitals not knowing that their rights were violated by New Jersey's forensic psychiatrists questioning them in an impaired state? Do you remember the words of the oath that you took to enforce the Constitution? In fact, do you remember the Constitution? If so, how is it possible for you to betray that oath every day? Fear? Why is it permissible to seek to censor or suppress my writings in violation of the U.S. and N.J. Constitutions? Also fear?

Let's get Anne Milgram in on this case. Ms. Milgram, does your alleged lesbianism prevent you from pursuing an investigation that may result in indictments of persons sharing your sexual-orientation or whom you have, as it were, "known"? Diana? What exactly is your relationship with Diana Lisa Riccioli? Debbie Poritz?

Menendez is said to be the "best" Democratic candidate available for the U.S. Senate in New Jersey. Horrifyingly, this claim may even be true. However, I doubt it. None of these claims are undermined by attempts to censor or silence critics. In fact, censorship efforts directed against me are the best proof of much of what I am saying. (See "What is it like to be tortured?")

What happened to Donald M. Payne? Why didn't he get appointed to the Senate after Torricelli's departure in disgrace? Are Democrats taking African-American voters for granted? Democrats may be in for a surprise. When pondering the abundance of chemical poisons in New Jersey's atmosphere -- which is comparable to the moral rot found in its legal institutions, especially the state Supreme Court -- it may help to focus on the inability or incompetence of those entrusted with the authority to punish polluters and clean up waste, especially in minority communities. (See "America's Holocaust.")

It is, sadly, quite possible that they are exactly as inept as they seem: "First came news of a day-care center in South Jersey in a former thermometer factory. Then came criticism that unlicensed consultants had been hired by developers and polluters to determine how to clean up contaminated waste sites."

Notice this important paragraph:

"And environmentalists expressed concern that the [N.J.] State Department of Environmental Protection did not know which contaminated sites needed cleaning the most, even though it was required by law to do so."

Tina Kelley, "New Jersey Vows to Overhaul Environmental Cleanup Work," in The New York Times, October 24, 2006, at p. B.2. (The situation is worse in 2009, see below.)

"The superintendent of the Paramus schools resigned on Monday night, following criticism of her actions after the discovery of contaminated soil at the Green Brook Middle School last year that eventually forced the school to close in May. The superintendent, Janice Dime, who had worked in the district for 22 years, will resign and receive $212,000 in salary for the coming year, plus $20,000 in medical benefits, said MARIO V. SICARI, the school board president."

Tina Kelley, "Paramus: Superintendent Resigns," in The New York Times, August 29, 2007, at p. B6. (Friend of Joe Coniglio? Hush money?)

Another "error" was just inserted and corrected in this essay. March 20, 2008 at 12:59 P.M. Coincidence?) Harassment continues May 23, 2009 at 10:56 A.M. Further federal investigations are about to lead to new indictments in New Jersey, allegedly.

II.

There is more than one kind of New Jersey contamination. Forensic psychiatrists (from Clifton or Ridgewood? Paramus?) selling their opinions to the highest bidders may have contributed to the following:

"The principal of a Passaic County middle school was acquitted yesterday of charges that he molested a thirteen-year-old girl [13!] in his vehicle while riding home from a New York Jets game three years ago."

"Newton: Acquittal For a Principal," in The New York Times, October 20, 2006, at p. B4. (See "New Jersey Judges Protect Child Molesters in Bayonne" and "We don't know from nothing.")

When asked about corruption and extortion in New Jersey politics, will Democrat Bob Menendez answer -- "On the one hand, but on the other hand?" Based on inferences from a recent article in The New York Times, there is reason to fear that this is likely:

"In a written question from an audience member, Mr. Menendez was asked why he supported Mr. Lamont. Mr. Menendez said that his support of Mr. Lamont was a 'mischaracterization,' adding that he 'supported Mr. Lieberman's run as an independent candidate.' ..." This was at Temple Beth Shalom in Livingston, N.J., but then --" yesterday morning after the two New Jersey candidates' comments were posted on the 'Empire Zone,' a New York Times political blog, a spokesman for Mr. Menendez called this reporter and asked that the Senator's comments be changed."

" ... 'What he was meaning to say is that he has enjoyed working with Mr. Lieberman and looks forward to serving with him should he be re-elected.' " Despite Mr. Menendez's statements ON THE RECORD at the synagogue,"... his [Menendez's] official endorsement is for Lamont, and he supports the party." (Bob Menendez is "for all the people.")

Jennifer Medina, "A Nod to Lieberman (for a While at Least)," in The New York Times, October 20, 2006, at p. B6.

As they say in law schools, "was he telling the truth then? Or is he telling the truth now?" Perhaps therapists may help Bob to sort this out. Is it unethical for a member of the bar to lie about an important matter of policy or position? Hacking into my computer and inserting "errors" in my writings will only serve to confirm an association between such tactics and the subjects of these writings. Harassing me will not make Mr. Menendez any more truthful or honest. What the hell, huh? If I repeat this often enough, there is a slim hope that the New Jersey Mob will get it. Why is access to my sites being obstructed? Who is associated with this "Lulu" site? Or the mysterious and frequent interloper identified below:

http://view.atdmt.com/iview/msnnkhac001728x90xWBCBRB00110msn/direct;wi.728;hi.90/01How about this? (Only two "errors" inserted in this text since my last reading of it. You Jersey guys are slipping.)

http://ad.doubleclick.net/adi/N3271.Scientific_American/B2473889.7;sz=728x90;ord=[timestamp]? (Is censorship an example of "scientific method"? Are these two sites "connected"?)

Here is another problem for Bob. Questions are being asked about the Bayonne waterfront project (remember the Brando movie about the mob in Bayonne?), made possible by $30 MILLION in "seed" money "procured" by Senator Bob from overburdened federal taxpayers -- in other words, "the chumps." What a hell-of-a-guy Bob is, huh? Where's that federal pu-pu platter, Bob? Tax payer-provided "tostones," eh? Have a cigar.

It turns out that many good friends and contributors to Bob's campaign, including Mr. DONALD SCARINSKI and Ms. KAY LICAUSI (a very close buddy of the junior Senator from New Jersey), have received lucrative positions and "substantial compensation" for work on this project. Voters wonder whether these friends have or will show their "appreciation" to Bob. "You take care of me, I'll take care of you." ("Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks" and "Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")

No wonder I discover new typos each time I read these essays -- typos not found in my printed versions of this same articles. Frustration tactics are intended to cause psychological harm. I have been forced to correct numerous "errors" inserted in a long essay on the writings of Raymond Chandler, only to find them reinserted the next day. This experience may have the opposite of the desired effect on me.

My second book is still suppressed. Is Senator Bob affiliated with Publish America? Lulu? Is Bob a secret partner in Scarinsci's and LiCausi's lucrative efforts? Oh, boy! More "errors." Inquiring minds and federal Grand Juries want to know. No wonder the assault on my computer takes place daily, with impunity. See David Kocieniewski and Ray Rivera, "Waterfront Project Reflects Two Images of a Senator," in The New York Times, October 29, 2006, at p. A1.

Allegations of chromium at that site are adding to the pressures on Bob. Voters would prefer not to get cancer, Bob. Allegations of an impending indictment against Senator Bob cannot be confirmed or denied at this time. In fact, no one can say or deny anything, ever, at any time -- except Tuesdays. Are these really the best people we can find in New Jersey to put in high office or appoint to the judicial bench? Ethics?

If you become an attorney hoping to find Brennan, Brandeis, Holmes, Cardozo, Douglas, Bazelon, Marshall or any of the other great jurists associated with U.S. legal decisions that you studied in law school, then you are in for a major surprise and disappointment when you finally get into a law practice anywhere in the Garden State. Most of the time, you will encounter political hacks and former "C" students in law school, who are now wearing judicial robes and pompous smiles in county courthouses. It is your job to pretend that each of them is Oliver Wendell Holmes, something which they secretly (or not-so-secretly) believe anyway.

These disgusting realities are known to state appellate tribunals producing legal opinions, ostensibly concerned to protect Constitutional rights of citizens -- rights which those same tribunals ignore every day. Much of American law has become an elaborate FRAUD, seemingly designed to deceive or persuade a population (in Orwellian terms) that "slavery is freedom." Politicians in the Garden State are fond of saying: "Nobody ever lost a dime underestimating the intelligence of the American people."

For those of us who continue to believe that the U.S. Constitution is the best document of its kind in the world and that much of the case law interpreting that text is magnificent, the only possible conclusion is that we live in a dual reality: a pretense at compliance with Constitutional provisions is given lip service publicly; even as a private and well-known reality of torture and secrecy, denials of access to information and exploitation is winked at by powerful officials growing rich on the people's money, while wielding disproportionate power. This is certainly true in New Jersey.

$300,000 in rent paid to Mr. Menendez by tenants who get federal money, thanks to him. Coincidence? Or quid pro cuo? Why do we put up with this situation? Where's the OAE? Menendez is a lawyer, right? Ethics Committee? Is it possible that there are (it couldn't be!) double standards in the ethics enforcement system? Horrors! How shocking all of this is for me. What does your rule book say, John?

Much of this cruelty and exploitation is only made possible, I surmise, by a stupefied and apathetic population which feels no need to keep faith with the men and women who have died to preserve our Constitutional guarantees. So long as the Constitution exists as a hope, if nothing else, this is not a situation which should be tolerated. I won't tolerate it. Neither should you. That's your money their playing with.

My free speech rights are not a gift of political bosses or something I have to bargain or beg for, least of all from criminals. These rights are part of my natural moral endowment guaranteed to me (and YOU) under the U.S. Constitution, a guarantee for which American men and women have died in every generation. They will not be surrendered. We owe it to the men and women who have fought America's wars -- especially to many who have died or been injured doing so -- not to be intimidated by anyone in expressing our opinions. Citizens in a free country must be as brave as the men and women who defend that country, every day. Are you a guilty bystander to censorship and torture?

It is time to hit the streets again with a little protest, sixties-style. It must be possible for Americans to recognize the horror and obscenity of this grim reality. The idea that torture is O.K., if it is done secretly (which I call the "Tuchin/Riccioli" torture method, at least in New Jersey), must not be allowed to succeed, not even in that unfortunate state:

"Should we create a professional [squad] of torturers, of interrogators who have been trained in the techniques and who have learned to overcome their instinctive revulsion against causing pain? Medical executioners were [traditionally] schooled in the arts of agony. ... Should there be a medical sub-specialty of torture doctors, [they're called 'behaviorist psychologists'] who ensure that gasping captives don't die before they talk? Recall the chilling words of Sgt Ivan Fredericks, one of the abusers at Abu Ghraib, who saw the body of a detainee after the interrogation went awry: 'They stressed the man out so much he passed away.' He was referring to Manadel Jamadi, whose ice-packed body was photographed at Abu Ghraib before the CIA spirited it away. ... Who should teach torture doctoring in medical school?"

How about New Jersey's own forensic/torture "specialists" Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli, who also likes a little sex with her victims -- perhaps when they are unconscious or under hypnosis, right Diana? Professor David Luban asks:

"Do we really want to create a torture culture and the kind of people who inhabit it? The ticking bomb distracts us from the real issue, which is not about emergencies, but about the normalization of torture. Some might argue that keeping the practice of torture secret avoids the moral corruption that might arise from creating a public culture of torture. But concealment does not reject the normalization of torture. It accepts it, but layers on top of it the normalization of state secrecy. The result [is] a shadow culture of torturers and those who train and support them, operating outside the public eye and accountable only to other insiders of the torture culture."

There must be a few people looking for those dirty shrinks, Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli. No wonder my computer is under attack. Remind the politicians and judges that they work for you. (I use the word "work" to refer to most New Jersey politicians' and judges' lucrative activities with some irony intended.) Tell them, as fans of the movie "Network" will recall, that after a disastrous war and occupation in Iraq, Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, Katrina, widespread corruption and mob involvement in state governments (like New Jersey's hopelessly tainted institutions), rising oil prices and diminishing expectations: "We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it any more!"

Additional Periodical Sources:

"The Torture Debate: The Missing Voices," (Editorial) in The New York Times, May 7, 2009, at p. A32.
"The Torture Debate: The Lawyers," (Editorial) in The New York Times, May 7, 2009, at p. A32.
Atul Gawande, "Ordinary Torture," in The New Yorker, Mar. 30, 2009, at p. 36. (Routine use of solitary confinement and other psychological techniques to induce psychosis or suicide of victims in American prisons.)
Philip Gourevich, "Torture on Trial," in The New Yorker, May 11, 2009, at p. 33. (Lawyers, tribunals, America's legal establishment is complicit in "crimes against humanity" committed against "little brown people.")
Mark Danner, "The Secret Red Cross Report on US Torture at Black Sites," in The New York Review of Books, April 9, 2009, at p. 69. ("Black sites" includes many more prisons than Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, including some within the United States.)
Mark Danner, ed., Abu Ghraib: The Politics of Torture (Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 2004).
Mark Danner, Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror (New York: NYRB, 2004).
Karen J. Greenberg, ed., The Torture Debate in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Andrew Sullivan, "The Abolition of Torture," in Sandford Levinson, ed., Torture: A Collection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 307.

Juan Galis-Menendez, "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "What is it like to be tortured?" http://Critique@groups.msn.com/ (MSN Groups has closed, I am told, depriving me of the use of images. Defacements, hacks, suppressions and censorship of these writings are routine.)

"A Despicable Enemy," in The New York Post, July 12, 2008, at p. 20. (Editorial documenting torture of American soldiers in response to U.S. torture tactics.)

The following essay has been reprinted without permission by a person or persons unknown to me at: http://www.myepilepsy.com/?q=node/961275 (Discrediting efforts on the part of the OAE?) Unless an essay bears my name and/or an acknowledgment, it should not be attributed to me, since it may have been taken from this site, illegally, and falsely ascribed to me in an attempt to discredit my views. I am not an epilectic nor have I ever been a member of the Communist Party. I am not with Al Qaeda. I do not have cancer or AIDS. I am not a Mets fan. I am "independent," politically speaking.

A focus for one's sense of outrage at the failures, or worse, of the U.S. legal system may be found at: http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/supreme/images/justices.jpg (N.J. is the most corrupt legal system in the nation.)

What do judicial robes mean to the people who wear them? How can anyone put on such robes, be aware of and/or ignore torture? See Nina Bernstein, "9/11 Detainees Describe Abuse Involving Dogs," The New York Times, April 3, 2006, at p. B1 (concerning torture of persons accused of crimes and presumed innocent in Passaic County, New Jersey).

Dr. Harold Mandel, "Psychiatry and Psychology Have Become Abusive Disciplines," http://www.topix.net/content/cj/140298183753272823 (Psychiatrists sell their services and violate fundamental human rights of victims subjected to illegal questioning or rape under hypnosis.)