Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.

January 8, 2010 at 3:20 P.M. Hackers from Trenton have inserted new "errors." I will do my best to make all necessary corrections. (See the forthcoming, "Sybil R. Moses Joins the Lesbian Love-Fest!" and "Debbie Poritz Likes the Ladies!" as well as "Kelly Anne Michaels Loves the Kiddies!")

I can only hope that New Jersey's hackers will continue to prove much of what I am saying. Before reading this essay, please see: "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "What is it like to be tortured?," also the General section at: http://www.Critique@groups.msn.com/ . (Has MSN Groups "closed"?)

October 19, 2009 at 9:50 A.M. An advertisement has been attached to this blog against my will: "ANTI-CORRUPTION TRAINING e-learning and face-to-face from risk management experts." http://www.promontoryts.com/

This may be an attempt at humor from New Jersey mafia members. I do not believe that the ad is from "Ads From Google." I suppose corruption is amusing to N.J. lawyers and judges.

As of February 24, 2009 at 4:19 P.M. My MSN Group is blocked, posting essays at blogger is obstructed, harassment is continuous. This is a relief. I was under the impression that Trenton's crooked judges and politicians had forgotten me. I am touched to see that they still care about me. The sex lives of Superior Court judges will be examined next. I will start with Ms. Poritz and Attorney General Anne Milgram. Lesbian loyalties? Perhaps Diana and Debbie are "soulmates"? Ms. Milgram, it cannot take years to prevent daily commission of crimes by government officials in New Jersey. "The Cover-Up Continues," (Editorial) in The New York Times, October 26, 2009, at p. A22.

As of February 8, 2007 at 2:56 P.M. I am unable to access my MSN group. Attacks on this essay by hackers are always expected. The image accompanying this essay may be blocked by hackers affiliated with New Jersey's power structure or with the subject of this essay. The same people may block my image in my profile. Words or letters may be deleted from the essay at any time. On July 16, 2007 at 2:04 P.M., as I was prevented from accessing my msn group, I blocked:

http://atdmt.com/DIR/view/msnkxdlc0110000 (The "Democratic Leadership Council"? "Senator Christopher L. Dodd"? "OAE"? I hope not.) Ms. Poritz will be dismayed to learn that New Jersey's legislators have rejected gay marriage rights. David Kocieniewski, "New Jersey Senate Defeats Same-Sex Marriage Bill," in The New York Times, January 8, 2010, at p. A18. (More money for Xanadu?) My views on this issue are found in "Is there a gay marriage right?"

The United States has tortured human beings, many of whom have not been charged with committing any crimes. None have been tried on any charges to justify such abuse. Besides, nothing justifies torture. The individual soldiers who engaged in these acts of torture have now themselves been charged with crimes. If convicted, they will be punished.

The Bush Administration continues to deny a policy of torture. Yet mounting evidence makes these denials less credible every day. Let us continue to hope that these denials are accurate. Mr. Obama's decision to close the Guantanamo facility a year from this writing is a welcome step in the right direction. Whether Mr. Obama will be able to execute his policy, despite opposition from Right-wing fanatics as well as obstructions from American intelligence agencies is difficult to tell. Does New Jersey continue to deny complicity in this course of criminal conduct victimizing me over decades? I trust that N.J. legal officials will have the minimal decency to come clean at last. Have you no sense of ethics, Ms. Poritz?

"An important United Nations panel criticized the United States ... for its treatment of terrorism suspects, and called for shutting down the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba." Tim Golden, "U.S. Should Close Prison in Cuba, U.N. Panel Says," in The New York Times, May 20, 2006, at p. 1. Despite Mr. Obama's tentative steps to close Guantanamo, that facility and many secret C.I.A. prisons -- including some that are located right here in the states -- are probably still in business. Raymond Bonner, "Detainee to Return to Britain, as Efforts to Prove Torture Claims Continue," in The New York Times, February 23, 2009, at p. A5.

It now appears that massive theft and criminal fraud in the development of torture methods and building of secret prisons has contributed to thefts from U.S. taxpayers. Leading proponents of torture and forensic "experts," like Terry Tuchin, M.D., slither through the corridors of power in New Jersey. David Johnston & Mark Mazzetti, "A Window Into C.I.A.'s Embrace of Secret Jails," in The New York Times, August 13, 2009, at p. A1. (New "errors" inserted and corrected, as Ms. Milgram departs her Trenton office.)

Rejecting American legal arguments as spurious, international authorities have called for immediate action to halt human rights violations by the United States, both nationally and internationally. See William Glaberson, "Military Insider Becomes Critic of Hearings at Guantanamo," in The New York Times, July 23, 2007, at p. A1.

The International Red Cross has issued reports condemning U.S. ATROCITIES in torturing detainees, allegations which should also apply to New Jersey's actions: Mark Danner, "The Red Cross Report on Torture and What it Means for the U.S.," in The New York Review of Books, April 30, 2009, at p. 48 and Neil A. Lewis, "Official Defends Signing Interrogation Memos," in The New York Times, April 29, 2009, at p. A12. (U.S. Circuit Judge Jay S. Bybee expresses no regrets about torture memo that he signed as a lawyer in the Bush White House.)

Mr. Bush's torture lawyers have been exonerated and excused for any and all liability, whether criminal or civil, by persons like the Justice Department's "Mr. Margolis." ("Legal Ethics in America's Torture Debate" and "Is America's Legal Ethics a Lie?")

Does either political party, for example, wish to be associated with the horrible crimes and tortures that have become a routine feature of New Jersey life and law? I wonder what Jefferson and Madison would say about this? Incarceration without due process of law and secret tortures, both within and beyond the U.S.? I have a feeling that they would not approve. I also believe that they would oppose efforts to obstruct freedom of expression, like those that I encounter in writing these blog entries nearly every day. Similar or worse horrors take place in the least enlightened American jurisdictions, torture and cover-ups, denials of due process, hiding of information that belongs to victims, usually by officials and judges -- like Deborah T. Poritz and her colleagues -- seeking to escape their now obvious responsibility for "crimes against humanity." (Soon: "Is Joel T. Leyner, Esq. New Jersey's Slimiest Fixer?")

Have you no sense of what you have done and failed to do, Ms. Poritz? Do you care about the continuing human misery resulting from your unethical lapses in judgment, Ms. Poritz? Do you presume to judge my "ethics," Ms. Poritz? Do you speak to me of "ethics," Mr. Rabner?

I am forced to contemplate the public destruction or defacements of my writings -- in violation of criminal laws -- by despicable hypocrites in positions of power in New Jersey, with a side interest in the criminal underworld, who then speak to me of ethics. New Jersey's tainted judiciary has lost any claim to utter the word "ethics" without provoking laughter. After years of harassment, theft, and worse crimes committed against me by persons "affiliated" with the New Jersey power-structure, I find it sad and sickening that I am still coping with cybercrime and censorship. Either we no longer have a Constitution or New Jersey has chosen to turn that document into used toilet paper. ("Manifesto for the Unfinished American Revolution.")

See: http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3746.html and Nina Bernstein, "9/11 Detainees Describe Abuse Involving Dogs," The New York Times, April 3, 2006, at pp. B1-B2 (one of many articles detailing psychological and physical torture of persons incarcerated while awaiting trial in New Jersey); and http://www.nj-civilrights.org/ ).

On April 30, 2009 former N.J. Senator Joe Coniglio was found guilty on all corruption charges as was the state legal system that made his crimes and a culture of corruption possible. Ms. Poritz will symbolize that culture of corruption for future generations of lawyers and citizens of the Garden State. 200 + convictions (so far) and many more are on the way. Ms. Poritz responds with a deafening silence to these allegations of incompetence and lack of concern for human suffering for which she must be held responsible in the court of world opinion. True, the suffering is mostly of persons Ms. Poritz may regard as her "inferiors."

For one of many allegations of racism against New Jersey courts, see http://www.profileingrace.blogspot.com/2005/10/request-for-transfer-to-other-court.html and Jascha Hoffman's article critical of the New Jersey Supreme Court's "improvement efforts" in Legal Times:

"... New Jersey's criminal justice system [is] embroiled in allegations of racism, manifested in racial profiling, unfair sentencing practices, and, perhaps most direly, wrongful convictions. Dozens of New Jersey cases have ... been overturned by DNA evidence." http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/January-February-2005/feature_hoffman_janfeb05.msp (See also "America's Holocaust" and "How to Execute the Innocent in New Jersey.")

The United States Circuit Court for the Third Circuit has taken the unusual step of describing the New Jersey appellate courts as incompetent. (See the sources quoted in "Psychological Torture in the American Legal System.") Sadly, N.J. courts are indeed incompetent and corrupt.

January 8, 2010 at 3:15 P.M. "Errors" inserted in this text have been corrected, once more.

For a detailed description of racism and torture in New Jersey's state police process and among tainted so-called physicians protected by Ms. Poritz as well as others like her, see Assata Shakur, "Prisoner in the United States," in Still Black, Still Strong: Survivors in the War Against Black Revolutionaries (New York & Paris: Columbia-Semiotexte, 1993), pp. 205-220 (Harassment of politically active attorneys and deliberate efforts by doctors in N.J. to obstruct and prevent victim's recovery.)

Things are probably worse now than when these articles were written. Ethics? There is excellent reason to believe that, within the United States and certainly in New Jersey, "therapists" have lent their services to the torture of persons by means of systematic inflictions of psychological torments for the purposes of "learning from" victims -- some of whom are not charged with any crimes -- or to extract information from them in violation of their human rights. It is likely that courts know about such mistreatment at the hands of torturers, like New Jersey's Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli, failing to prevent these offenses while choosing to cover up many terrible crimes in exchange for sexual favors or cash, perhaps. New Jersey's disgraced Supreme Court justices must respond concerning what they knew of these tortures and when they knew it. Was Ms. Poritz supplied with "introductions" to willing young women? Ms. Milgram? Diana? This would be a good time to insert more "errors."

Judges sticking their heads in the sand is not going to make these allegations go away. Such a policy of denial will only lead to new allegations of incompetence or malice by courts in the most corrupt state in the nation -- again: 200 convictions for corruption (so far) and counting. Such crimes are a direct result of a theory of persons -- derived from so-called "scientific psychology" -- which defines human beings as animals and nothing more. ("Behaviorism is Evil" and concerning "surveillance and monitoring" in our society as a Foucauldian "carceral continuum," see: http://www.ACLU.og/safefree/spying/2431/prs20060321.html ; see also "Crimes Against Humanity in New Jersey" and "Psychological Torture in the American Legal System.")

Persons are reduced by such "scientific psychologists" to their basest and most material impulses, becoming objects of manipulation in order to be made to "adjust" to American society, since adjustment is equated with "sanity." Psychological torture has become the dirty little secret of the American legal system. There are other views of human nature and of what constitutes sanity. For example, Thomas Merton asks:

"What is the meaning of a concept of sanity that excludes love? [What kind of sanity] considers [love] irrelevant, and destroys our capacity to love other human beings, to respond to their needs and their suffering, to recognize them also as persons, to apprehend their pain as our own? Evidently this is not necessary for sanity at all."

The Non-Violent Alternative (New York: Farrar, Straus &Giroux, 1980), p. 161.

If you demean, insult, torment, terrorize, abuse women in American prisons, then you may be certain that you will turn those women into the monsters that you depict them as to the world:

"If you have a drug offense, you can't get a Pell greant. ... You leave me no choice but to start drugs again and hope I don't get caught. Cause you won't let me go to school! It's crazy! ... You just want to beat me, beat me, punish me, punish me. And then expect me to come out of prison reformed! ... At some point I'm just going to become what you expect me to. I'm gonna become that monster."

Lee Wengraf, "Women in the American Gulag," in International Socialist Review, May-June, 2010, at p. 75, pp. 76-77, quoting inmate. (Reviewing Rickie Solinger, Paula Johnson, Martha Raimon, Tina Reynolds and Ruby Tapia, eds., Interrupted Life: Experiences of Incarcerated Women in the United States (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2010), $22.00.)

Silence in response to this horror is complicity in what can only be described as a continuing crime against humanity, even (or especially) when it is committed by politicians and judges, whatever their ethnicity or race. I wonder whether Ms. Poritz has enjoyed a little chat with one of the women whose lives have been devastated by her decisions? I doubt it. ("Crimes Against Humanity in New Jersey.")

Boilerplate speeches about the wonders of the New Jersey Bar Association lend an element of hideous farce to the blatant and sickening corruption characterizing New Jersey's legal system today, along with the unjust treatment of poor and incarcerated persons in the state's bemerded courtrooms and in its Dantesque prisons and jails. Do judges in that malodorous state feel no shame about such matters? ("New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court" and "New Jersey Superior and Supreme Court Whores." )

Is it unethical to ignore "crimes against humanity," Chief Justice Poritz, so as to concentrate on posing for portraits, then lobbying for pay increases for judges, like you? I think so. Why is it that your successors -- who must be aware of these horrors -- have felt no need to take remedial action? Too scared? ("Stuart Rabner and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Jaynee LaVecchia and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

Where are the $300 MILLION that disappeared in the HIP deal, Jaynee? Did you share the loot with Debbie? ("Law and Ethics in the Soprano State" and "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")

I protest on behalf of all persons subjected to psychological torture or censorship -- anywhere and for any reason -- by any government or faction, especially anywhere in the United States. I ask those who wield power in their majestic black robes -- who speak so easily of law and justice to others -- to consider the meaning of the symbols that they have become. I ask them to refuse the easy option of not seeing the evil before their eyes. I ask them not to remain apathetic to the suffering or humanity of victims of "secret" tortures who now stand before them. I ask them to ponder the resemblance between those victims and their own loved-ones or even themselves. (See again: "Letter From a Torture Chamber" and "Psychological Torture in the American Legal System" and "Crimes Against Humanity in New Jersey" together with all of the essays in the "General" section at my msn group, Critique.)

Each day that the cover-up continues, Ms. Milgram, is a renewal of the torture. Even lesbians who commit crimes must be charged for those crimes. ("Anne Milgram Does it Again!")

"Between 1976 and 2000, the United States built an average of a new prison each week and the number of imprisoned Americans increased tenfold. With a current prison and jail population of over two million, America has become the uncontested world leader in incarceration. Prison has made the threat of torture part of every day life for millions of individuals in the United States, especially [but not exclusively] the 6.9 MILLION currently incarcerated or otherwise under the control of the penal system. More insidiously, our prison system has helped to make torture a routine part of American culture."

H. Bruce Franklyn, "Torture, American Style," http://www.historiansagainstwar.org/resources/torture/brucefranklyn.html (See my essays "Foucault, Rose, Davis and the Meanings of Prisons" and "America's Holocaust.")

"Although men make up over 90% of the 2.3 million residents of the American gulag, the number of women in prison is growing at a rate double that of men. Since 1977, the number of incarcerated women has increased more than sevenfold. Interrupted Life is a powerful indictment of the crisis faced by an exploding number of women behind bars." (ISR, May-June, 2010, at pp. 75-76.)

The categories in which America continues to lead the world are imprisonment of offenders who are not tried, sanctioned rape, psychological torture techniques, and public silence about these atrocities that the rest of the world finds so disturbing. Let us chat about hypocrisy and ethics in the American legal system, Ms. Poritz. How does a Jew, of all people, become Mengele? Eichman? How can New Jersey's legal officials and OAE lawyers cover-up censorship along with other violations of civil rights? Do you judge my ethics, Mr. Rabner? Do you believe that I am less "ethical" than Mr. Prisco, Chief Justice Rabner? Please invite your friends in law enforcement to witness this daily spectacle of censorship and government criminality emanating from New Jersey.

Incarceration is a principle and not simply something done to particular offenders in American society. It explains the attitude of judges and other powerful rulers who see their mission as the control and instruction of a benighted population in need of their care. The Constitution provides an opposed vision of a free people, entitled in their autonomy and dignity, to self-determination and free judgment concerning values and political questions, without interference from government "for their own good." To presume to decide what is for the good of another person who has committed no crime, is to violate that person's right to autonomy; hence, it is not for society's "own good" for judges or "experts" to do so. What is for my "own good" is only for me to determine. Eric Schmidt, "Surveillance Effort Draws Civil Liberties Concern," in The New York Times, April 29, 2009, at p. A12 and "The Eavesdropping Continues," (Editorial) in The New York Times, June 18, 2009, p. A36. Calls received on June 31, 2009 at 8:15 P.M. from the "Independence Party" at 212-962-2364 asking for my signature to put Mr. Bloomberg's name "on the ballot." Illegal spyware and intrusions into my computer are a daily phenomenon.

In a recent article bemoaning the horrors of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, Fred Branfman said: "... the world is divided into evil doers, their victims, and those who ... don't want to know." See Fred Branfman, "On Torture and being Good Americans," http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/tik0603/branfman and David Kocieniewski, "After 22 Years in Prison, Man Convicted of Role in Two Murders is Freed," in The New York Times, June 17, 2009, at p. A24. (According to federal appellate judge, N.J. appellate courts are incompetent.)

In which of these categories do you belong, Ms. Poritz? Are you an evil doer or someone who does not want to know? Are you, Ms. Poritz, malicious or merely incompetent? What did the New Jersey Supreme Court know and when did they know it? Is rape a kind of "therapy," Ms. Poritz? Are you, Ms. Poritz (or Ms. Milgram) a party to the vandalism of these writings? Have you "gentlemen" failed to prevent such vandalism emanating from Trenton or N.J. computers for years?

If you, the reader, were facing final judgment today (which you are, even if it is only your own), which of these categories would you fit into? If you will be wearing a police officer's uniform, or black robes, or an expensive suit as you walk into a courtroom to try a case, then please consider the meaning of our symbols of justice. Do not rationalize or justify evil because it is easier "to go along to get along." Make things difficult and not easy for yourself by doing the right thing, because it is the right thing. How can you judge others, if you refuse to judge yourself?

How can a person put on black robes and forget what they mean? "If a man does not judge himself," says the Hasidic Rabbi Nachman of Bratlav, "all things judge him." How can anyone be a part of covering up psychological torture, rape, theft, while denying a victim the truth about his own life, yet speak of ethics or legality? The words must turn to ashes on the lips of such a person: $400 million dollars stolen from UMDNJ; $4.3 billion missing, or a "short fall" as a result of "gimmicks" (Corzine); 200 New Jersey political or legal officials and friends convicted; more indictments and convictions on the way; tainted judges; racism on the Turnpike and Parkway; ethics complaints filed against state Supreme Court justices, probably at the secret behest of their so-called "colleagues" who are controlled or paid off by political organizations and/or the mob; allegations of marijuana smoking on the N.J. court; totalitarian secrecy; incompetent judges creating a culture of unethical and incompetent administration of laws; expensive portraits or other perks for justices as teachers', police officers', firefighters' pensions are endangered. $1 BILLION in tax increases for 2009-2010 in a state where approximately $400 MILLION (at least!) of this "increase" will surely be stolen, while an $8-11 BILLION dollar deficit brings the economy to a predictable collapse. Are you all "drunks" in Trenton? "Delusional?"

Censorship and other civil rights violations are condoned by N.J. justices, on a daily basis, along with criminal efforts to continue the psychological torture of victims. I am struggling to defend my security system as I type these words. Many of my essays are altered or defaced on a daily basis in violation of copyright laws and the U.S. Constitution. How many lawyers were licensed to steal money and clients from my office, Terry Tuchin? What role did Senator Bob play in all this? How could this not be political? Who licensed the actions of Terry Tuchin in 1988? You are responsible Ms. Poritz -- and twenty years of torture are renewed every day that the cover-up continues. Have you no sense of your responsibility in this matter, Ms. Poritz? Is MSN really "closed"? Will any new "errors" be inserted in my writings today?

A U.S. Attorney who is now governor is forced to describe the entire New Jersey legal and political system as a "culture of corruption" and "diseased." (Christopher J. Christie.) Coast to coast lawyers and judges describe New Jersey as an "insult to the U.S. Constitution and a national disgrace." I agree with them.

The Wall Street Journal refers to New Jersey as a "byword for corruption" and as America's "Italian problem" because of Mafia influence in courts and politics. Is there no one in New Jersey capable of meeting with me to tell me the truth about these matters? Nobody? Not one of you? This is when you may wish to insert another "error," ladies.

How do you live with yourselves? What do you whisper to yourself, Ms. Poritz, that allows you to live with your obvious hypocrisy and a legacy of suffering caused to so many others because of your stupidity? How do you sleep at night? As you sit in the halls of power and privilege, I ask you to think about what you have become. Not all the robes and trappings of office can change the reality of corruption and hypocrisy in a FECES-COVERED New Jersey legal system desperately in need of reform, together with some attempt to redress blatant and foul-smelling "crimes against humanity." ("America's Holocaust" and "Driving While Black [DWB] in New Jersey.")

Have you no sense of guilt, Ms. Poritz? How do you look at yourself in the mirror, Mr. Rabner? (Access to MSN is still blocked for me.) Did you not swear to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America, Mr. Rabner? Why have you, Mr. Rabner, chosen to ignore Constitutional violations by persons claiming to act on behalf of the court (or OAE) in an effort to cover-up criminal actions of N.J. officials or their agents? Anne Milgram, Esq.? "Soulmates," Ms. Milgram? The word "ethics" associated with Trenton's OAE is absurd. The OAE has brought disgrace and shame to a tribunal that sickens lawyers and decent people in America and the world. ("New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court" and "New Jersey's Legal System is a Whore House.")

October 26, 2009 at 9:41 A.M. I awoke to discover that my television signal was dead. This has occurred on several prior occasions, service calls are useless, until the signal mysteriously returns to the set. Coincidence?

Those terrible crimes are your true legacy, Ms. Poritz and Mr. Rabner. Your catastrophic errors, Ms. Poritz, are the inheritance of your successors. Those failures will continue to fester and rot in the legal system of New Jersey until they are examined in the light of day. (See "Maurice J. Gallipoli and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Sybil R. Moses and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

I am told that my essay discussing Mr. Gallipoli's view of "rug merchants" has been translated into Arabic. It will provide one view of the ethnic and racial bias in New Jersey's legal system.No wonder they obstructed my computer access today. Perhaps hatred of Arabs is just fine with Ms. Poritz. I wonder why this is true, if it is true? No more "errors" to be inserted today, Ms. Poritz?

Do you hate the little brown people, Ms. Poritz? Or do you only hate victims when they are men as distinct from attractive very young women? Ms. Milgram, do you prosecute child molestation? Cybercrime? Conspiracies to violate civil rights and censor speech by government officials and their agents?

It is the victims of those crimes who now judge you, as their victimizer in black robes and false smiles. It is those victims who call upon you to face them and acknowledge this terrible evil. There must be some capacity for decency in you, Ms. Poritz -- however minimal it may be -- that tells you of your obligation to face those persons whose lives have been destroyed by your incompetence or malice making some attempt to redress the wrongs for which you are responsible. I am not a laboratory animal to be experimented upon, secretly, by quacks like Terry Tuchin. My Constitutional rights are not subject to violation because it is "interesting." I am not a slave. I will not legitimate your criminal incompetence. ("Foucault, Rose, Davis and the Meanings of Prison.")

Where are those reports and videos submitted, secretly, by Terry Tuchin? Diana Lisa Riccioli? How is it possible for New Jersey to continue to cover-up the heinous abuses associated with hypnosis techniques misused over decades against many persons in the Garden State. Corey Kilgannon, "Hypnosis Rigged Sex Case Against Him, Man Says," in The New York Times, October 20, 2007, at p. B2 (the plague is spreading from N.J. into New York) and see again: Raymond Bonner, "Detainee to Return to Britain," in The New York Times, February 23, 2009, at p. A5. (Restrictions that are routine under New Jersey law are deemed "barbaric" and prohibited under European law.)

New Jersey judges continue to remain, at best, indifferent to their responsibility for such crimes and to their victims' suffering, resulting from unnecessarily blighted lives. New York Times, April 3, 2006, at p. B1 (use of vicious dogs and other tortures against persons presumed innocent and awaiting trial in New Jersey jails). With each day that passes and the cover-up continues, these horrible tortures are inflicted yet again on their victims. The whole world is watching. Any legal system complicit in the cover-up of on-going violations of fundamental human rights, like the rights to free speech and privacy, is no longer a legal system in a Constitutional Democracy. ("What is it like to be tortured?" and "How Censorship Works in America.")

An effort is underway to deprive me even of my right to speak and publish my words or use images in protest against these great evils through daily defacements and destruction of my writings. If freedom of speech means anything -- something which is doubtful in New Jersey -- it must include the right to protest freely against a corrupt state legal system and unethical judges, like you, Ms. Poritz or Mr. Rabner. How much cash do you two "justices" need to "fix" a case for somebody like Angelo ("the Horn") Prisco? Care to remove a letter from one of my words?

It is no answer to these accusations to deface my writings or to seek to destroy my work -- nor does complaining about pathologies and failures produced, deliberately, by torturers in victims over years of unsought and secret "treatment-torture" do anything more than underline the guilt of those judicially protected torturers, like Terry Tuchin and Debbie's "babe," allegedly, Diana Lisa Riccioli. How much did you steal from me, Diana? How much did you steal from Marilyn, Diana? Are you really a racist, Diana? You will not silence me. Perhaps I will find a noose hung on my apartment door today. (See "New Jersey Judges Protect Child Molesters in Bayonne, New Jersey" and "We don't know from nothing.")

Is Neil M. Cohen, Esq. an "ethical" lawyer in New Jersey? Is Paul Bergrin, Esq. an "ethical" attorney? Anne Milgram, Esq.? Robert ("mischaracterization") Menendez, Esq.? Xanadu, anyone? De Cottis? How did you people split up the loot from the Prisco release? ("Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?" and "Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks.") How is Ms. Luchese, Bob?

For yet another example of a corrupt N.J. official apprehended by the feds because of lethargy or incompetence at the Trenton A.G.'s office (to say nothing of the corrupt and unethical OAE), see Jeremy M. Peters, "Ex-Official Pleads Guilty in Corruption Scandal," in The New York Times, October 20, 2007, at p. B2 and "One of New Jersey's Highly Ethical Attorneys Has a Problem" as well as "New Jersey's Legal System is a Whore House." In the Summer of 2009, 44 arrests of N.J. lawyers and politicians -- including mayors and assembly members -- have AGAIN placed the Garden State at the center of national disgust and outrage at blatant corruption as well sickening perversion. ("Is Union City, New Jersey Meyer Lansky's Whore House?" and "New Jersey is Lucky Luciano's Havana.")

For another impending scandal involving BILLIONS in public money and the shadowy presence of Senator Bob, Esq., see Peter Applebome, "Xanadu, Perhaps a Folly For Our Times," in The New York Times, February 22, 2009, at p. A27. ("Nobody invests TWO BILLION dollars for a one year window ...") Tricia Tirella, "North Hudson to Appeal NAACP Suit, Hiring Freeze," in The North Bergen Reporter, March 1, 2009, p. 1. (Racial discrimination in public hiring in Union City, West New York, North Bergen and Guttenberg, including hiring for legal positions perhaps, at the request of Cubanoid politicians, probably, and their friends.)

Disparate outcomes in Hudson County Municipal Courts and allegations of "two sets of books" in some towns are among the issues to be investigated, allegedly. More federal law suits are coming. Have you no shame in New Jersey's legal profession? ("How to Execute the Innocent in New Jersey." Tuchin? OAE?)

What do you say to yourself, today, Ms. Poritz? What do you tell yourself that makes it o.k.? Do you have any sense of what you are responsible for in the legal system over which you presided? How can your successors and so-called "colleagues" live with their own hypocrisy or with the stain and STENCH of these offenses? How can they judge the ethics of others, when they (like you) are so lacking in ethics? Is blocking my Internet access to personal sites a "solution" or "ethical response" to these criticisms? Is your only answer to tamper with my writings or try to prevent me from writing? Do you not see that a tumor is devouring the legal institutions of the state in which you "served" as "Chief Justice" because of your incompetence and unethical failures to act, Ms. Poritz? Ms. Milgram? Ethics? Do you feel no shame about that failure, Ms. Poritz and Mr. Rabner? Do you believe that blocking the number of hits at my blogs is fooling anyone?

How is it possible for you, Ms. Poritz (or Mr. Rabner) to speak the words "law" or "justice," let alone "ethics"? How is it possible for these offenses to continue to be committed, every day, by persons enjoying judicial protection in New Jersey? Is there a mob boss we should speak to about these matters? Do you expect the cover-up to continue indefinitely? Is there any legitimacy or respect possible for New Jersey's Supreme Court when its members have become an international joke and horror show? (See again: "What is it like to be tortured?" and "A Letter From the DRB, in New Jersey!" and "Another Letter From the DRB, in New Jersey!")

Do you wish to threaten me again? Would you like to deface my writings once more, Ms. Poritz? Or is censorship and suppression of criticisms something that your friends in New Jersey's legal profession do for you? Pumping up the slander machine against me will not get you off the hook for your crimes and even less for the cowardice as well as desperate "ass-covering" that has accompanied their revelation to the world. 1988-2010. I want all of the reports and statements that were denied to me. Open file policy? Discovery? Do you speak of ethics, Ms. Milgram? Did you sell your judgeship for "introductions" to "sexually willing" young women, Ms. Poritz?

Each day that the cover-up continues is a renewal of twenty years of torture not only for me, also for many victims, including the legal system of New Jersey and the tribunal you have disgraced. Hackers, viruses, obstructions against my computer coming from New Jersey, I insist, are no answer to these charges. That STENCH of corruption and incompetence is what you, Ms. Poritz -- and the court over which you presided -- have now become for many people in the United States of America and all over the world. It is what your tribunal, which is no longer the court of the citizens of your state, will continue to symbolize for humanity -- corruption and incompetence, malice, cruelty, racism, intolerance and greed. You sicken decent people everywhere in the world, Ms. Poritz.

Does anyone believe that the U.S. is in a position to criticize the free speech rights of persons in other countries if the nation fails to address these horrifying realities in the fetid Garden State?