China Rebukes U.S. for Hypocrisy and Cyberhegemony.

June 27, 2010 at 11:20 A.M. More "errors" inserted overnight, obstructions and denials of access this morning, further harassments and censorship must be expected.

February 10, 2010 at 9:21 A.M. A stranger took a photograph of me yesterday, at about 9:00 P.M., with what appeared to be a professional camera, at 59th Street and Columbus Circle. Perhaps I was an interesting subject? The New York Times? ("Incoherence in 'The New York Times'" and "Manohla Dargis Strikes Again!")

February 5, 2010 at 10:21 P.M. "Errors" were inserted in several essays. My clock was tampered with, further vandalism must be expected. I will continue to make corrections while focusing on the sex lives of N.J. judges. Did Terry Tuchin or New Jersey's OAE have something to do with "Chivalry Film Productions?" I still have your cap. (Soon: "Kelly Anne Michaels Likes the Kiddies!")

January 31, 2010 at 11:04 A.M. I was revising this essay when hackers deleted words from my sentences and altered the text. This is part of the induced frustration effort. I will continue to struggle to post writings on-line. New essays examining unethical legal practice in New Jersey and judicial corruption will be posted within days of this revision. More judicial profiles and exposes of prominent members of the bar will be posted in the weeks and months ahead.

January 29, 2010 at 9:04 A.M. New attacks on my security system prevent me from updating my protection. I will attempt to restart my computer. I can never be sure of returning to the Internet after one of these attacks. Within America, victims of cyberattacks report: "half of the respondents believe they have already been attacked by sophisticated [U.S.] GOVERNMENT intruders" seeking to suppress speech and control the dissemination of views on-line. Does this happen in China? Cuba? (Times, 1-29-10, at p. A9.)

January 27, 2010 at 10:04 P.M. I have been unable to update my security system. I will have to take time from my devoted attention to the State of the Union Address by Mr. Obama to restart my computer. Maybe that will help. This means that I could be prevented from accessing the Internet again. I will do my best to continue writing. My books are suppressed; one of those books will not be sent to booksellers.

I greatly fear that President Obama is beginning to lose the attention and loyalty of the electorate as he descends further into political catch-phrases and obfuscations. We are withdrawing from Iraq, except that we are not really withdrawing. We will close Guantanamo in one year, except that we have not done so. President Obama appears to the world like a man swimming in fast-hardening concrete. Incidentally, leaving 50,000 troops may prevent chaos and a blood bath in Iraq, but it may also draw us into further hostilities and it will be expensive. New "errors" were inserted in this work when I came to review it this morning.

August 31, 2010 at 8:14 A.M. I do not know the true number of hits at these blogs -- 50-100,000? Each time you visit my blogger profile, you can see the effects of unpunished cybercrime and attempts to deny an audience to a writer. I can only hope that my work will be published outside the U.S. I am often plagiarized inside the U.S. The mafia finds my writings distasteful. I find child porn protected by cops and courts far more distasteful and "unethical." ("Judges Protect Child Molesters in Bayonne, New Jersey" and "We don't know from nothing" and "More Child Molestation and Prostitution in New Jersey.")

Perhaps a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court would be concerned about my free speech rights if I were a multinational corporation donating to the coffers of politicians the "justices" happen to like. ("North Bergen, New Jersey is the Home of La Cosa Nostra.")

January 27, 2010 at 7:00 P.M. I am reviewing this work at a public computer. I am still unable to update my security protection. Three scans today reveal numerous security risks and spyware. Secretary of State Clinton, do we still ask China to respect freedom of speech on-line? If so, should New Jersey not do the same? Senator Bob, give my regards to Ms. Luchese, or LiCausi. ("Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks.")

January 27, 2010 at 5:10 P.M. Several attempts to update my security protection have been obstructed by hackers from New Jersey. Criminal violations of privacy rights and cybercrimes of various sorts are committed on a daily basis in attacking my computer. I cannot determine how many writings have been damaged at this time. I will struggle to make all necessary corrections. ("What is it like to be tortured?")

January 27, 2010 at 1:50 P.M. I am unable to update my security system's protection against viruses because hackers are obstructing that system. I will continue to try to do so throughout the day. This blocking of my security system, which is only possible with government technology, usually results in the insertions of "errors" in various writings. ("Fidel Castro's 'History Will Absolve Me.'")

I have never and I do not now agree to interference of any kind with my writings, my security system, or my efforts to make use of images and publish my work on-line. I will not meet with or have anything to do with any official or attorney from New Jersey, except in a federal courtroom or equivalent location. I will bring my own recording device to any such meeting. I will memorialize the conversation at any meeting and post the summary on-line. This will help prevent the N.J. smoke machine from misrepresenting me to others. I cannot say whether Senator Bob enjoys "cross dressing" experiences. Such experiences have not been a part of my life.

January 27, 2010 at 9:32 A.M. Continuing attacks on these writings are expected in response to the political content of these expressions. These attacks emanate from New Jersey government or judicial sources, I believe, whose criminality is tolerated or secretly encouraged in America. New Jersey should "grow up" and face the facts in this situation. We all need to move on, Mr. Christie, by dealing with this matter in an honest and forthright manner before a federal tribunal. ("How Censorship Works in America.")

Keith Bardsher, "China Announces 3 Arrests in a Crackdown on Hacking," in The New York Times, February 9, 2010, at p. A11. (Will N.J. cybercriminals ever be arrested?)
Michael Wines, "China Issues Sharp Rebuke to U.S. Calls for an Investigation of Google Attacks," in The New York Times, January 26, 2010, at p. A6.
Michael Wines, "For 13th Time, Critic of China Is Barred From Travel Abroad," in The New York Times, March 3, 2010, at p. A4. (Fewer restrictions for Chinese dissident than I face every day.)
Michael Wines, "American Envoys Arrive in Beijing to Try to Mend Relations," in The New York Times, March 3, 2010, at p. A6. (U.S. publishes insults of China's officials and then seeks to "mend relations.")
John Markoff, "Cyberattack Threat on Rise, Executives Say," in The New York Times, January 29, 2010, at p. A9. (Cyberattacks in America, many from government sources -- allegedly.)
Helene Cooper, "U.S. Arms For Taiwan Send Beijing A Message," in The New York Times, February 1, 2010, at p. A4. (On the assumption that the U.S. is not involved in a sufficient number of conflicts in the world, Right-wing Cubanazo-Republicano forces, reputedly, have sought to provoke a conflict between China and America. This would not be wise. "Helene?" Manohla Dargis? Patricia Cohen? I can only hope that these people have nothing to do with Sarah Palin.)

"BEIJING -- China delivered a bristling response on Monday to the United States' demand that it investigate recent attacks on American computers from Chinese soil, saying that any suggestion that it conducted or condoned the hackers' intrusions was 'groundless and aims to denigrate China.' ..."

I can only hope for international attention focused on New Jersey's on-going cybercrime campaign against my writings, suppressions of my work, economic and social harm, denials of the use of images, access to MSN and other sites, as well as many other forms of harassment and violations of privacy. Censorship by government is unethical in America. Google seems unconcerned about these cybercrimes emanating from an American jurisdiction, which also victimizes Google and Blogger as well as MSN. ("Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "What is it like to be plagiarized?")

Attempts to change the subject by promoting hostilities between nations or factions, as a distraction, will not alter the "pressing" urgency of New Jersey's juridical meltdown. New Jersey is a jurisdiction on the verge of a Dodge City-like lawlessness at the center stage of world opinion, embarassing America, symbolizing the decline of a society to the world. We must be better than New Jersey's current disgusting reality. Let us hope that Mr. Christie can improve things very quickly.

"The comment in a published interview with a government spokesman, was part of a broadside in China's state-run news media on Monday that cast the United States as a cyberhegemonist trying to dominate the global information flow by meddling in Chinese Internet policies."

America's orchestrated media silence in response to this public spectacle of censorship and copyright violations which I am experiencing -- a spectacle that has continued for more than a decade -- suggests that the relationship between U.S. journalists and politicians, who are allowed, evidently, to insert comments in their news "reporting," is much cozier than most people realize. ("Manohla Dargis Strikes Again!" and "Why do they hate us?")

"Helene" is usually a Spanish-inspired spelling of this name. Do you mean "Helen"? Or do you mean to refer to Helena? Elena? Is "Helene Cooper" a real name?

I can only hope that it is true that Chinese news media has become interested in my story. I am told that coverage of this grotesque and criminal farce concerning my "ethics" has begun to appear beyond the nation's borders. America's corporate media has been reluctant and slow to cover these crimes, I guess, pending instructions from the board of trustees at the various media outlets. (See the films "Bob Roberts" and "Bulworth.")

An "error" was inserted in the foregoing sentence since my previous review of this essay. I expect this sort of harassment to continue.

"Interviews and news articles placed in major newspapers and on prominent web sites underscored the chill in public exchanges between the [U.S. and Chinese] governments since Jan. 12, when Google threatened to leave China unless Beijing stopped censoring its search results."

Government officials in the U.S. -- such as Melissa Hathaway and Howard A. Schmidt -- with intelligence and cyberwarfare credentials should be looking into these matters. Both of these "operatives" (C.I.A.?) or officials may be political animals, however, and therefore "reachable" by New Jersey's mafia-influenced faction of the Democrat attack machine. Hence, in a Democrat administration it may be too much to expect that they will take any action to prevent the censorship that you are witnessing at these sites. I will review this essay from a public computer. I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. I am an independent. ("U.S. Courts Must Not Condone Torture.")

New Jersey's continuing studied silence is deafening. Have you no shame, Mr. Rabner? How can you wear judicial robes, Mr. Rabner, knowing what you are responsible for in terms of human suffering and cover-ups in an ethically suspect legal system? Each day that the cover-up continues is a renewal of twenty-one years of suffering for many people, including children and old people, along with every litigant in your failed legal system. ("What is it like to be tortured?" and "Stuart Rabner and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

"China's reaction to the issue, at first muted, has been caustic since Friday, a day after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham-Clinton" -- who is detested, absurdly, as a "Communist" by Miami's lunatic fringe of the Cuban-American community -- "called for Beijing to conduct 'transparent' inquiry into the attack. Mrs. Clinton also singled out China's Internet censorship as a threat to the free flow of information." ("How Censorship Works in America" and "Censorship and Cruelty in New Jersey.")

"Monday's fusilade by the Chinese not only dismissed Mrs. Clinton's statements, but also depicted the United States as cyberspace's villain and China as its unwilling victim." ("American Hypocrisy and Luis Posada Carriles" and "Havana Nights and C.I.A. Tapes.")

New Jersey's mafia brigades enjoy protected cybercrime opportunities emanating from Trenton. The obstruction of the measure of visitors to these sites is the direct result of New Jersey cybercrime aimed against me. Child-porn and illegal gambling have been routine aspects of mafia Internet activity tolerated (for a small fee) in the Garden State.

The legal profession and judiciary in New Jersey are complicit in mafia-political activities. New Jersey lawyers are often corrupt, inept, dishonest and mendacious. Some of my essays have been corrected in identical ways fifty times or more. ("New Jersey is the Home of the Living Dead" and "New Jersey's Legal System is a Whore House.")

Perhaps this disgust and hypocrisy describes many American lawyers. However, New Jersey's legal profession has achieved unprecedented levels of corruption and theft. ("Corrupt Law Firms, Senator Bob, and New Jersey Ethics" and "American Legal Ethics Today.")

"Zhou Yonglin, the deputy operations chief of China's National Computer Network Emergency Response Technical Team, was quoted as saying that China was the world's largest target for hackers with more than 262,000 Internet addresses under assault last year, and that the greatest share of attacks [against China] -- one in six -- originate in the United States."

I would not be surprised if 200,000 of these hacks came from New Jersey. Mr. Christie, your administration of a state which has become a symbol to the world of criminality in government -- as you must know better than anyone! -- should begin on a note of optimism by dealing with this hideous and sad spectacle of cybercrime and censorship, attorneys participating in criminality, slander, theft, and other orchestrated assaults against a person who was described by these same attorneys, to his face at any rate, as a "colleague and friend." Rape is not therapy. ("An Open Letter to My Torturers in New Jersey, Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli.")

The continuing refusal by New Jersey to acknowledge and make amends for these atrocities, persistent cybercrime and censorship, suppressions of speech and threats, thefts and sexual assaults shames the United States of America, trashes our Constitution, publicly, and undermines what little credibility we still have on human rights issues in the world, or free speech, even less credibility when it comes to these thorny questions of state cybercrime and cyberhegemony. ("Is Senator Menendez a Suspect in Mafia-Political Murder in New Jersey?" and "Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")

There must be some New Jersey judges and lawyers with the remnants of a minimal sense of decency and integrity, perhaps among those who practice outside of the Garden State. Such decent persons will understand the sad spectacle that N.J. has become to the on-line world. Do the right thing, Mr. Rabner, for once in your life. ("American Lawyers Escape Prosecution for Torture" and "America's Holocaust" then "No More Cover-Ups and LIes, Chief Justice Rabner!")