Stuart Rabner and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.

Mr. Rabner swore to "uphold the U.S. Constitution and the laws of the state of New Jersey." Has Stuart Rabner done that? Is it true that, years ago, Mr. Rabner declined the opportunity to investigate Mr. Madoff's financial shenanigans? I wonder why that would be true, if it is true? This guy, Rabner, is the "Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court." That's right, the "Chief Justice" of New Jersey's legal system is besmirched by allegations of cronyism, corrupt relationships and favors for politicians, selective and partisan enforcement of laws, not to mention covering-up the atrocities of Terry Tuchin or Debbie Poritz, perhaps, as regards little-old me. Diana Lisa Riccioli? What did Rabner know and when did he know it?

How many others have been secretly questioned under hypnosis by "Dr." Tuchin? Mr. Rabner? Where are those reports filed by Tuchin? Riccioli? How's your buddy, Angelo ("The Horn") Prisco? Are you not ashamed that this spectacle of corruption and criminality continues on a daily basis, Mr. Rabner, because no one in New Jersey's judiciary or government has the courage to abide by the Constitution? How can you remain indifferent to rape, theft, censorship and other crimes committed by persons with the nerve to judge my "ethics"? How can the complicity of the OAE in civil rights violations and cover-ups continue to be ignored? Have you no sense of decency, Mr. Rabner? Anne Milgram, Esq.? Do you require cash in an envelope to discharge your responsibilities? This is New Jersey, after all.

September 19, 2009 at 7:05 P.M. "Errors" were inserted in this essay since my previous review. I have now corrected those "errors."

June 31, 2009 at 8:15 P.M. calls from 212-962-2364. ("The Independence Party" supports Mr. Bloomberg.)

June 4, 2009 at 2:22 P.M. call from 402-982-0687.

April 21, 2009 at 6:08 P.M. I am unable to access MSN writings at this time. No images can be used; italics and bold script are unavailable because of computer attacks directed against me. No response to my request for information from N.J. has been received. Telephone calls all day from 877-692-8683.

June 12, 2008 at 8:24 A.M. I am still obstructed in my efforts to back-up files. This allows for the insertion of "errors" in essays, such as this "appreciation" of Stuart Rabner's legal acumen. I will make all necessary corrections as often as I must.

June 10, 2008 at 10:58 A.M. calls from 702-520-1455; at 1:23 P.M. from 850-478-2651. "Errors" were inserted in a number of essays at "Critique." I will make corrections as quickly as possible.

June 10, 2008 at 8:18 A.M. For the past hour or so, I have been trying to access my MSN group in order to write essays for today. At this time, I am unable to do so. My cable signal was blocked, briefly. Attempts to print items from my computer left me with a blank page bearing this address:

http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3285.msn_CUSA/B2343920.20sz=300x250;ord=438962351? (Cuban American National Foundation? US Commerce Department under Cuban-American Secretary Gutierrez of the Bush Administration? Appellate Division, NJ?)

This is the second day this week when I have been unable to write. It is impossible to tell, at this time, how much damage has been done to essays. I will continue to struggle.

June 9, 2008 at 4:40 P.M. I am running scans, trying to back up files, struggling against the usual harassments. I may be unable to write today. However, I will keep trying until I can do some more work.

June 7, 2008 at 11:20 A.M. My updating feature is blocked again, no images can be posted at blogger. In what follows I do not accuse Mr. Rabner of giving anyone his business card.

New Jersey Justice Rivera-Soto is duly sanctioned for giving someone his business card as well as for refusing to accept bribes or to participate in organized crime. Give him time. He'll learn "how to go along, to get along." Right, Senator Bob? ("Does Senator Menendez have Mafia Friends?")

New Jersey's current Chief Justice, Stuart Rabner, is yet another example of a politician disguised as a judge. Worse, good old Stu' is a corrupt politician, whose claim to fame was to "demur" on numerous occasions when Democrat politicians from the Garden State faced federal prosecution. Only when a Republican was targeted was Stuart Rabner interested in prosecuting corruption, that is, only in a minor matter arising in a small town of course. Otherwise -- in the most corrupt state in the nation -- there were ZERO prosecutions of any prominent so-called "Democrats" originating under Rabner's stewardship of the A.G.'s office. Rabner didn't know from nothing -- and he liked it that way. Anne Milgram's "Lesbian Love-Fest" precludes law enforcement efforts from her office.

Mr. Rabner's alleged homosexual encounters as a young man at Harvard University are irrelevant to charges of incompetence and corruption in his failure to discharge the responsibilities of N.J. Chief Justice. There is not one shred of evidence that Mr. Rabner really likes young girls (as Debbie Poritz allegedly does!) or that Rabner's "relationship" with his daughter is in any way "inappropriate." All of these allegations and much worse were made against me, usually behind my back, by persons claiming government authority to disseminate their poison with less basis than exists for the charges aginst Mr. Rabner.

At least, no such prosecutions for Democrat corruption by Rabner were covered in the press to the best of my knowledge and recollection. Certainly, Rabner was deficient in his duties or the 200 or so culprits arrested and convicted by the feds -- after Rabner's departure from the U.S. Attorney's Office and before his so-called "service" as Chief Justice -- would not have thrived during his "stewardship" of the A.G.'s office. Looking the other way, Stu? Was an envelope left in your office when you served as Attorney General "with a little something" for the holidays? No other explanation makes sense of Rabner's lethargy. What's your price, Stuart? ("New Jersey's Political and Judicial Whores.")

For a small fee, probably, Rabner "didn't see nothing and didn't know nothing." Naturally, this led to Rabner's appointment to the New Jersey Supreme Court, where the sort of person who "sees and knows nothing" does quite well, usually. (See "New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics (OAE)" and "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")

I make much more serious accusations against the current New Jersey Chief Justice and the soiled court on which Rabner sits. Stuart Rabner must have been a player in the sinister "Prisco" mafia release, whether Rabner received cash under the table or "favors" for his assistance, if any, is a matter for speculation. By reputation, Rabner is a "go-along" guy who (allegedly) facilitated the ouster of Zulima Farber from behind the scenes, where most of what matters unfolds in New Jersey's slimy political and legal circles in order to ease the way for his pal, Anne Milgram, Esq. (see The Soprano State, at pp. 135-139.)

If Stuart was unaware of the questionable Prisco release, then he was clearly derelict in his duties of supervision as state Attorney General; but if he knew what was going on concerning the violation of procedures that coincided with a hefty "contribution" to the Democrats "non-federal" account -- followed by Prisco's release -- then it is more culpable behavior by the man who is now New Jersey's Chief Justice. Either way, Rabner should no longer serve as "Chief Justice" in New Jersey. ("Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")

How is it possible not to question the integrity of this individual and of the court where he presides in light of the almost daily corruption and incompetence chronicled in the national media that refers to Rabner's state as "a byword for corruption"? The Wall Street Journal chuckles that "New Jersey is America's Italian Problem." Appearance of impropriety? Why not resign, Stuart? Isn't it time for New Jersey not to be referred in The Wall Street Journal and other periodicals as America's "corruption problem"? New Jersey is a disgrace to America's legal system.

"According to documents obtained [by the Star Ledger] the university [of medicine and Dentistry] contributed nearly $60,000 to state and local political officials from a 'community events fund.' The largest checks went to the Democratic Senate Majority, the political action committee that funds Democratic campaigns in the Senate."

I wonder how much of this loot went to good old Bob Menendez? Joe Coniglio? Richard J. Codey? No comment from or action taken by New Jersey's then Attorney General Stuart Rabner? Did they "share" the loot with good old Stu? No comment from the other tainted state Supreme Court justices? Nobody knows from nothing. How about it Anne Milgram, Esq.? (Only one letter deleted from this essay, so far.)

How do you people live with your disgusting hypocrisy and greed? Do you presume to comment upon or judge my private life? Many of New Jersey's legal eagles did just that. How do you have the nerve to comment on the "ethics" of others in New Jersey's feces-stained tribunals? Whatta-ya need to get those items to me, Stu?

This would be a good time for another attack on my computer or to insert "errors" in my writings.

Rabner did "favors" for politicians, allegedly, by not paying attention to their "activities" -- politicians like Lynch, Lesniak, and Codey as well as unspecified "others," Neil M. Cohen, Esq.? -- whose gratitude has brought Stuart to his current prominence. Whether these favors were granted in exchange for money or advancement, it is difficult to say. You decide.

I suspect Rabner's current judgeship was the price of Stuart's "soul," to the extent that he has one. During his years as A.G., for example, Stuart was not averse -- as we shall see -- to looking the other way at mob activity in Atlantic City and elsewhere in New Jersey. (See again: "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System" and "Law and Ethics in the Soprano State.") Is Paul Bergrin still your buddy, Stuart? ("Is Paul Bergrin, Esq. an Ethical New Jersey Attorney?")

To the extent that Rabner is aware of the participation of N.J. lawyers and judges in censorship efforts directed against my sites, or at any time when he became aware of CRIMES committed against me, Rabner was obliged to bring these crimes to the attention of the authorities and ethically constrained from acquiescing or participating in any way in committing such offenses or in covering up the offenses that were committed after they came to his attention. Silence is endorsement, Stuart. Again: What did you know, Stuart, and when did you know it? (As I say, this may be a good time to have one of your friends delete a letter from this text or another of my writings.)

Rabner liked to arrest people from Long Island on gambling charges in Atlantic City, when illegal gambling was easily found a stone's throw from his own office in Trenton. I am sure that Stuart Rabner -- who is sworn to "uphold the Constitution of the United States and all laws of New Jersey" -- is aware of crimes committed against me and others, on a daily basis, as well as of the whereabouts of Tuchin's and Riccioli's "reports." Rabner will LIE -- under oath, if need be! -- and claim that he knows nothing about these matters. Rabner's silence is a daily lie with lethal consequences for New Jersey and America. (See "New Jersey Superior Court Judge is a Child Molester" and "New Jersey's Legal System is a Whore House.")

Mr. Rabner is a product of New Jersey's political-legal establishment and "family-like" organization, who is stained by (and smells of) many deals that have brought him to prominence as the chief adjudicator and "ethics" official in Trenton. Each day that the cover-up continues, Mr. Rabner, is a renewal of the tortures for many innocent persons and not just for myself. How close are you, Mr. Rabner, to Paul Bergrin, Esq.? Did Bergrin provide you with some "shake-and-bake," Stu? Your silence in response to atrocity is "unethical conduct," Stuart. How does a Jew become Eichman, Stuart?

If you're both amused and disgusted by this contaminated jurisdiction, so am I. This essay has been altered several times by criminal hackers. I must expect more of the same treatment in the future. Most decent people are sickened by the shit hole that is New Jersey's judiciary and legal system. (See "New Jersey is the Home of the Living Dead" and "New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court.") Good Old "Stu" Rabner only "demurs."

If you are litigant in that state, think of the courts as a joke. Try to figure out who you need to take care of, quietly, in order to get things done. Attacks on these writings continue to be constant, which helps to prove much of what I am saying. For two days, I have been unable to write at my MSN group, "Critique." ("America's Holocaust" and "Driving While Black [DWB] in New Jersey.") I am told that MSN has "closed."

"The New Jersey legal system is headed, of course, by the New Jersey Supreme Court, mostly composed of lawyers with political CONNECTIONS" [emphasis added!] -- what happened to the independence of the judiciary? -- "but little prior judicial experience. ... the court effectively makes its own laws and orders them carried out, thus acting as all three arms of government. Seemingly few justices have read the state constitution, and if they did, they didn't understand it. The result is seven unelected, largely unknown political appointees controlling housing and education and all manner of other elements of daily life."

Bob Ingle & Sandy McClure, "'See No Evil,' Law Enforcement and Court Jesters," in The Soprano State: New Jersey's Culture of Corruption (New York: St. Martins, 2008), pp. 138-139.

Rabner had zero judicial experience, little trial experience or private practice experience before becoming New Jersey Chief Justice. Rabner's focus on the "public corruption" of Republican mayor, John "Mack" Lake, is bizarre, given that his own party and office were put to shame by federal indictments of over two hundred corrupt New Jersey political operatives and flunkies, many connected to Rabner. More than 200 criminals in total are in the federal pooper scooper (so far!) for dirty government practices in Trenton while Mr. Rabner was on the job. Perhaps Stuart Rabner will join them.

How does a Jew become Mengele, Stuart? Debbie Poritz? What do you say, Terry? Are most of the persons you question under hypnosis in the presence of agents of the state "minority group members," Terry? Is Diana an admitted "racist"? Is Diana an "alleged" rapist? These are the people associated with the OAE and NJ's Supreme Court who "evaluate" my ethics? These are the people who label me "unethical"? You decide who is more "unethical."

Reporters were shocked, as I have noted, by Angelo ("The Horn") Prisco's release after mysterious "contributions" to the Democrat's coffers. ("Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?") Stuart Rabner, Esq. -- as Attorney General -- had no questions about Prisco's release. Rabner thought everything was hunky-dory. Did you have sex with Marilyn, Terry Tuchin? Alex? Was that only Diana who was having sex with Marilyn? Was she unconscious, by the way, when these acts were performed on her, "ladies and gentlemen"?

Is that "ethical," John? Is bribery of public officials who happen to be lawyers hunky-dory, John? Where's the OAE on this? (See "Senator Bob Loves Xanadu!" and "Senator Bob, the Babe, and the Big Bucks.")

Where was Stuart Rabner when these "shenanigans" took place? Wasn't Rabner New Jersey's Attorney General at the time of these mysterious contributions to Democrat coffers? Should Rabner not have been aware of the actions taken by the corrections department and other state agencies -- actions whose legality was his responsibility? "Appearance of impropriety," Stuart? Do the honorable thing for once in your life and resign, Stuart. New Jersey needs honest judges and a competent Supreme Court.

"Machine politics is not based on doing what's right for the state or in the long term. It's what good for the [Democrat] party and getting candidates elected, and that usually means putting the faithful [like Rabner] in jobs regardless of qualifications or whether the job is needed." (p. 277.)

Has Stuart Rabner tried Superior Court cases to conclusion, both civilly and criminally? I doubt it. However, Rabner will decide on the competence of others to do such work, including those who have indeed tried such cases. This is like asking a proctologist to explain brain surgery to a neurological specialist. Stuart being the proctologist, as it were, in every sense.

Stuart Rabner had nothing to say when the state approved "$175 MILLION -- in bonds, borrowed money -- to rebuild Camden in 2002. The city's deficit went from $9.8 million in the 2005-6 budget year [to an "unspecified amount" today] without a lot to show for it" -- allegations of THEFT by Democrats were ignored by Stuart Rabner, as A.G., who is intimidated or controlled by George E. Norcross, III, allegedly. (p. 177.)

Mr. Norcross is, allegedly, also calling the shots for Anne Milgram, Esq. Nobody voted for Norcross, but hey, what the hell? All you have to do is get some young women for Anne Milgram to "party," and she lets you slide. Right, Anne? ("Sybil R. Moses and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

Rather than discouraging attacks against whistle-blowers and supporting whistle-blower law suits in order to fight NJ corruption, Stuart likes to make such do-gooders "go away" because negative publicity about N.J. corruption could hurt Rabner's public image and slim chance of getting to the U.S. Supreme Court. We wouldn't want that, right Stuart?

"The link between Prisco, Segal, and the politically connected lawyer Scarinsci was Prisco's cousin Robert De Brino, a rough-talking Hollywood producer and former New York police officer. [Connected?] De Brino was known to others in New Jersey -- including McGreevey. Coauthor McClure obtained a letter signed by McGreevey, then governor-elect, to De Brino telling him it was a pleasure meeting him in connection with a fund raiser for families of Port Authority officers who died on 9/11." (p. 239.)

9/11 victims probably never saw any money after "expenses" at this so-called "fund raiser."

Rabner made the whole embarassing situation go away for local politicians by settling the Connolly whistle-blower law suit with a $480,000 "pay out" and a job closer to home for Mr. Connolly. YOU, the Garden State resident might call that a "bribe" in exchange for the whistle blower "forgetting-about-it." I could not possibly comment any further at this time. By the way, YOU (tax payers in N.J.) paid for that "bribe." They called it a "settlement."

"Attorney General Stuart Rabner's aides said the lawsuit was settled because the state was expecting to lose big time," I wonder why they expected to lose? "but they were unable to explain why the case wasn't pursued from a criminal standpoint." (P. 242.)

Rabner was obviously "told" to make the situation disappear. There is an old joke in New Jersey that a "judge is a lawyer who knows a politician." Stuart Rabner has inspired a variation on this chestnut that says: "A judge is a lawyer who takes care of things for politicians and mobsters." (see pp. 151-161.) Compare "Is Senator Menendez a Suspect in Mafia-Political Murder in New Jersey?" with "Jim Florio and the Mafia in Atlantic City."

Was Paul Bergrin a friend, Mr. Rabner, who introduced you (Rabner) to young ladies or men? Ever accept Mr. Bergrin's "hospitality," Stuart? If so, do you remember her name?

In the event that I am prevented from writing by additional computer attacks, I will find a public computer to post items on-line.

Stuart, you have no standing to speak to anyone about ethics or to preside over the legal system in any American jurisdiction. The thought of someone like Stuart Rabner as "Chief Justice" of any state's "legal system and supreme tribunal" should make you sick. Stuart, you are part of a cover up and criminal conspiracy to withhold the truth from me and others concerning torture and systematic violations of fundamental Constitutional rights by agents of New Jersey's government and legal system, along with persons enjoying "apparent authority" to act "for" New Jersey's legal system. You will not cover up these atrocities for long. (See again: "New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court" and "What is it like to be tortured?" as well as "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")

Is the "appearance of impropriety" not sufficient for a judge to resign from the bench, Mr. Rabner? ("New Jersey's Political and Judicial Whores.")

Sybil R. Moses and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.

The photo accompanying this essay at "Critique" depicting New Jersey "judges" stuffing their faces -- at your expense, probably -- has been blocked several times. Suddenly, they seem a little shy. I wonder why? Is it significant that their hands are under the table? Are envelopes filled with cash being passed around? This essay has been subjected to an attack and numerous defacements. I wonder who would wish to do such a thing?

"Judge" Tolentino was described by a prominent Hudson County prosecutor as "pulling decisions out of her ass" (even her law clerks were stupid) and Schaeffer was "spoken to" several times concerning his "dislike for Latino lawyers," but no one is more arrogant than Moses. I will describe those two at length soon and also the "Honorable" Mark Baber. This is my best response to the destruction of a text I was working on yesterday by N.J. hackers.

Errors have been inserted into this essay overnight. I will correct them, making it a point to select more New Jersey judges, forensic psychiatrists, and their family members for public examination and interrogation concerning their activities. My family members have been harmed by my experiences of torture. I think it is only fair to question, publicly, the family members of others doing the harming. I am blocking

http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3754sitemsn.com/B... June 11, 2007 at 10:00 A.M.

As of June 2, 2007 at 12:25 P.M. there were 11 intrusion attempts against my computer. Main attacker: 24.192.175.47. (NJ)

June 3, 2007 at 5:53 P.M. I am blocking and defending against the following sites and/or hacks:

http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3671.MSN/B23225;
http://ad.doubleclick.net/adj/N3285msn-dm/B171;

http://view.adtmt.com/iview/msnnkhac001728x90 ;
http://view.adtmt.com/iview/msnnkhac001160x600 .

Intrusion attempts and hacks will continue throughout the day, mostly originating from computers in New Jersey judges' chambers, others are probably located in government offices in Trenton or Jersey City, perhaps Hackensack.

June 5, 2007 at 9:38 A.M. I have experienced great difficulty in accessing my blogs and writing today. I will do my best to cope with these problems. These frustration tactics and threats, or other difficulties, are usually effective against persons who have committed no crimes, yet have been subjected, over decades, to similar and much worse methods of control by "social scientists." Curiously, a small number of bizarre persons seem to insist on their freedom. I will always resist such criminal oppressions described by the New York Times as "Doctor Assisted Torture."

Bob Ingle & Sandy McClure, "'See No Evil' Law Enforcement and Court Jesters," in "The Soprano State: New Jersey's Culture of Corruption" (New York: St. Martin's, 2008), pp. 127-163.
"Medically Assisted Torture," (Editorial) The New York Times, April 9, 2009, at p. A26.
Assata Shakur, "Prisoner in the United States," in "Still Black, Still Strong," (Paris, New York: Semiotexte, 1993), pp. 203-220 (Physicians in New Jersey participate in torture of African-American p.o.w.s, including psychological torture, long before Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. Terry Tuchin?)


My first job in the legal world was "law clerk." Whatever the job title, that's what the position amounted to, a clerkship. Young law school graduates who do well, academically, are given the opportunity to work with judges, assisting in drafting documents and opinions. A clerkship is a coveted opportunity to learn early in one's professional life about legal practice and the court system. Clerkships were traditionally denied to minority and "non-traditional" (meaning women, especially older women) law students and attorneys.

That year the state of New Jersey "urged" judges to make things look fair by hiring a few of "those" people who had previously been excluded. The terms used by the Supreme Court of New Jersey were the usual legal mumbo-jumbo and officialese, but this is what they were saying: "We'll have to put up with a few minorities until the press gets off our backs." And they did.

My clerkship was illuminating. I saw some people I still think of as great judges; others were terrible. Ironically, the greatest professional success went to judges who were terrible on the bench, but highly political. It was my first taste of the arrogance of power. It foreshadowed some of my later experiences.

New Jersey's legal system is a hideous farce, corrupt, tainted by organized crime, club house decisions, theft, incompetence (nowhere more so than in the bemerded -- that means "shit-covered" -- so-called "ethics-enforcement" system). Favoritism and bias are the orders of the day in legal ethics proceedings. Mafia influence is pervasive. I didn't know that then. I will spend the rest of my life struggling against the evil found in that state's legal system, while seeking a confrontation and chat with a few people who have harmed me and others that I care about. My primary emotions when contemplating the spectacle of N.J.'s legal system is disgust and anger.

Today I will focus on one judge I consider a very bad legal thinker, a person who is somewhat unintelligent, making up for stupidity with a domineering and gruff manner. She is a symbol, for me, of much that is wrong with that state's legal system. The fascinating aspect of discrimination or cultural assumptions made about "those" people -- members of the lower-orders (like me) -- is the opportunity they afford victims to anticipate what others will think of us and how we'll be treated.

If people assume that you are an idiot, then it is sometimes in your interest to let them think just that, in order to observe them and figure out what they're like. What makes that person tick? How does that judge decide cases? Moses was generally thought to be worthless as a judge, but she was said to be "related" to politically powerful persons in the state.

If you know something about jurisprudence, you can sit in several courtrooms on motion day and observe judges coping with legal arguments, quickly figuring out who is a positivist or realist, which judge is likely to respond to legal economics or natural law arguments, who is a moron ("oxy" or otherwise), and who is genuinely interested in being challenged. This is true even if most judges have no idea what any of these terms mean. Naturally, New Jersey's "connected" litigants will do well regardless of the lack of merits in their arguments.

If you can educate a judge in such a way that he or she will be convinced that they have taught you something, that judge will see you as a genius. Those judges who are willing to be educated on an issue and actually listen to what you say, are always the best judges. They are rare. Rare to the point of being unique in New Jersey. I say this whether they decide for or against you in the end. Lawyers want to believe that their arguments have been considered and weighed fairly. They often sense that this has not occurred. They cannot express such an opinion publicly. I think that their doubts are accurate on many occasions -- at least in New Jersey.

Law and argument have very little to do with the majority of decisions in the Garden State. Coopted minority lawyers will always be found -- among those seeking advancement -- to say that everything is "great" in the most corrupt and inept state legal system in the nation. (Compare "New Jersey's Feces-Covered Supreme Court" with "New Jersey's Ethical and Legal System.")

Minority judges will also be trotted out by New Jersey's legal system to say that everything is hunky-dory -- despite the overwhelming evidence of bias -- and that I am "not a team player," only a "malcontent." Ad hominem attacks are routine for me. They were part of my life from day one, usually secretly and in violation of so-called "ethics." Any crimes committed against me, or cover-ups of such crimes will be deemed, legally speaking, no big deal. I am one of the sub-humans destroyed by the system. Who cares? No one.

I happen to recall a great deal concerning exactly how some of those minority judges were "elevated" to the bench, "allegedly," and what they said about the process. I will devote more time to judicial profiles in the new year. Still $25,000 cash for a Superior Court judgeship, allegedly? If so, it is overpriced.

There are countless others similarly destroyed by the crimes committed by powerful officials in the Garden State -- often as a result of sheer stupidity -- and these crimes will also be covered-up by the legal system. The same system's players who will judge the "faults" of others are adept at avoiding responsibility for their own catastrophic errors and crimes. Take another look at the portraits of New Jersey Supreme Court justices. They sure look happy, don't they? No worries. Business as usual. (See "Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Maurice J. Gallipoli and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

We are now up to 179 persons (mostly minority) exonerated from death row or life terms, after murder convictions, as a result of DNA evidence indicating that errors made at trials were ignored on appeal. New Jersey appellate courts say, "errors made themselves." That's the kind of thing I think is unethical -- convicting the innocent and (theoretically) even executing them, then disclaiming responsibility for such failures and deliberate as well as on-going CRIMINALITY. My struggle against censorship and ass-covering New Jersey lawyers as well as judges is a daily experience.

The judge I will describe today is SYBIL R. MOSES. When last heard from, she was wreaking havoc as a Superior Court judge in Bergen County, New Jersey. She is depicted, I believe, in a photograph taken at a Passaic County bar event with DEBORAH T. PORITZ and good-old JAYNEE LAVECHIA (Genovese or Gambinos?), none of these women are likely to win the Nobel Prize. I was once asked, after expressing an interest in writing: "How many Nobel Prizes do you have?" To which my answer is: "Just as many as you."

I was asked to write a memo for Ms. Moses examining a legal issue in administrative law. I wrote a short memo, after finding a case right on point. I quoted language that was dispositive of the legal question presented, answering the issue raised pretty clearly. I quoted that key language from the judicial opinion in my memo. I moved on to my next project when Ms. Moses -- one of several judges making use of a reduced staff of law clerks -- barged into the library, accusing me at the top of her lungs of having fabricated a quote.

My paragraph from the decision contained an ellipsis because the quote was part of a very long passage. This paragon of judicial probity had failed to see the language in the paragraph in the printed text, assuming that I must have been mistaken in my reading of the case, since she could never err.

After accusing me, publicly, of "lying" and "inventing" this quote, I pointed out the place in the decision where the words I quoted were to be found. Judge Moses did indeed find the language quoted in the decision on the very page where I said it was to be found and stormed out of the room. Ms. Moses was offended because she had accused me of something that I had not done. It was thoughtless of me to prove her wrong. I said I was sorry.

Two days later, after being reminded by others that I had in fact -- only in a small way, of course -- actually been correct in what I said, this female Justice Brandeis invited me to her chambers and explained, privately, that she might have been a tad hasty in her remarks. Judge Moses said that I must try to be more accurate in the future. Politely and respectfully, I thanked her for her kind advice. It was for my own good. She was trying to help me. Of course, she was. By the way, she used the quote that I recommended.

I later read the full decision in the matter on which I had submitted the memo, discovering that my reasoning and the language in question had been "adopted." I never received an acknowledgment of assistance. Other law clerks did. I also never saw Ms. Moses or any other judge speak to one of my fellow clerks in the manner that I was addressed on that occasion, PUBLICLY. I wonder why? Judicial temperament? Racism? Bias? Plain old stupidity? A little of each of these explanations is probably accurate.

Years later, I observed Judge Moses' Superior Court session and noted her disdain, arrogance, high-handedness and causalness towards litigants, especially minority males. I forced myself to be polite and smile, once again, because I had to think of others' interests. I could not then express what I felt or thought. However, I can now.

Any minority defendant -- especially African-Americans -- appearing before Judge Moses should look at the possibility (or probability) of bias. Perhaps this is the belated revenge of Judge Moses against an African-American lawyer (the great Mr. Raymond Brown, Sr.), who prevailed in a celebrated case against Moses, whom she detested and probably still hates.

One of the few positive aspects of my current "post-mortem" condition is that I can -- and I will -- speak freely. The after-effects of trauma, especially tortures at the hands of Tuchin and Riccioli (the authorities in N.J. know that these things have happened and don't care), is a curious disconnection from my own life and from any sense of danger. Maybe it is true that you can only kill a person once. If so, then there is not too much more they can do to me. I am not referring to any legal actions taken against me which can always be manufactured in New Jersey. If there is such a thing as psychological murder, then I am pretty sure that I have experienced it.

The daily defacements of my writings is routine now. The authorities entrusted with protecting First Amendment rights will pretend to know nothing of these tactics, while applauding them privately. As with so many other matters in New Jersey's legal system, hypocrisy and fraud is the order of the day. ("Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture" and "What is it like to be tortured?")

It is certainly possible, as I am often told, that I will be framed for something, hurt or "killed" for my opinions, which are expressed publicly. It is interesting how many people feel this way in New Jersey. Americans are frightened to speak publicly of political figures in a society that guarantees freedom of expression to all. Internet goon squads hired by legal authorities -- or (no doubt) acting with their consent -- commit crimes, with impunity, by destroying my work. I am referring to the people who hack into my computer to deface my texts nearly every day.

Mysteriously, I am unafraid. Something important is dead in me. And what is left is dying slowly. Fear is not an option. I have a novel to finish. You can't have any fear when writing a long novel. The daily bullshit just slides off me. The intolerance, air of self-assigned superiority of Moses is a defining characteristic of her judicial brethren, who are semi-illiterates in some instances, yet they are prepared to "explain" and "instruct" the rest of us concerning all matters of culture without the slightest hesitation. Not once when these great minds imparted their wisdom was I asked whether I had read anything dealing with the subject under discussion. These people -- like Moses -- assume a natural intellectual "superiority" to the likes of humble old me and you.

New Jersey criminalizes unconsented contacts by so-called physicians with any persons -- including hypnosis or drugging of victims of interrogation -- and also denials of discovery demanded under due process principles, including a subject's medical and legal records. N.J. actually "sanctions" slanders of a victim and secret contacts by attorneys with a colleague's clients, if they want to target a member of the bar who refuses to play ball with the powers that be.

All unconsesual physician- or lawyer-contacts with victims are illicit. Lying about such contacts (Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli) -- including lying through studied silence -- as well as cover-ups makes things worse. Hypocrites and frauds, like Moses, allow for such criminality and worse, when their "buddies" engage in it, even as they presume to judge my "ethics." I am now judging their ethics.

This Moses episode was a minor incident in my life as a legal professional in the American legal system. There were far worse things witnessed and experienced at the hands of New Jersey's so-called "judges." Ethics? In New Jersey? (Compare "America's Holocaust" with "Foucault, Rose, Davis and the Meanings of Prison.")