More Censorship and Cybercrime.

October 23, 2010 10:33 A.M. After the obstructions yesterday, I managed to return to this site to discover newly inserted "errors" which have been corrected. ("Time to End the Embargo Against Cuba.")

June 26, 2010 at 10:58 A.M. Various computer obstacles made accessing this blog difficult today. New "errors" were inserted in this essay which had been left alone for a while, thus proving much of what I am saying in this work. What is painful and embarassing (for me) is the realization that many of the fascist idiots doing this censorship for a fee are Cuban-Americans.

May 4, 2010 at 12:04 P.M. Obstructions and harassments made reading "Is it rational to believe in God?" impossible this morning. I cannot say what damage has been done to that essay or other writings overnight at these blogs.

Yesterday I struggled to make the latest corrections of "errors" -- sometimes the same "errors" corrected on many prior occasions -- that were placed in my essays by New Jersey hackers. ("Roberto Unger's Revolutionary Legal Theory" and "'The Fountain': A Movie Review.")

This constant assault on my work is obviously intended to bring about the destruction of a mind. The GOAL of the torments, I believe, is to cause long-term and permanent psychological harm to me. This effort to destroy an intellect is undertaken with the secret cooperation of government officials in at least one American jurisdiction.

Letters from "Publish America" and the "DRB" are still in my possession. Records from my security system are available. Repetitive induced frustrations have been "used" to bring about psychosis or severe depression in "laboratory animals" and/or persons held as inmates in the various concentration camps of our world. These may be overlapping categories. ("The Heidegger Controversy.")

It takes a very special sort of person to use such methods in an effort to "control" unruly dissident intellectuals or any persons designated for destruction by the powers-that-be. For that person to delight in cruelty is even more unusual and sick. I look forward to seeing the "persons" (I use the word "person" loosely) doing such things to me and, probably, to many others. Are there people who "specialize" in cybercrime and cybertorments in America? Mr. Ginarte, can you shed any light on these matters? ("What is it like to be tortured?")

Several essays were vandalized, notably two essays that (I think) are scholarly and effective in establishing difficult philosophical arguments: "Charles Taylor and Modernity" and "A Philosophical Investigation of Ludwig Wittgenstein." I hope that I have made all necessary corrections of those essays -- at least, as of yesterday evening they were O.K.

"Errors" are inserted on a daily basis in my writings to make it impossible for me to know whether the texts are defaced whenever I return to them. The goal is to keep the victim in a state of anxiety about needed creative work and expressions, also to suppress criticisms that could result in indictments of corrupt Trenton or Union City officials. Frustrations are designed to obstruct or prevent new writing that may further embarass N.J.'s politicians as additional arrests are, once again, about to take place in the Garden State. ("Does Senator Menendez Have Mafia Friends?")

This would be a good moment to return to those essays, if you're a New Jersey torturer, in order to restore the "errors" that I have previously corrected. This will maximize the harm done to me. Let us see whether this torture has any effect on my actions. I doubt it. Does cybercrime seem to you, Mr. Ginarte, like an effective response to a philosophical argument? ("'The Fountain': A Movie Review.")

I am sure that it is because these writings are perceived as good that they will be especially chosen for destruction. It is much easier to break a mind belonging to another person than to develop a good mind for yourself. You like hurting people who have the effrontery to be smarter than you are. This category of the intellectually "superior" to you will include many people, Mr. Ginarte. This is true for all of us, by the way, but it is especially certain for people like Mr. Ginarte. "Who had the stop sign?"

Were you at the "Philosophy Cafe" at MSN, Mr. Ginarte? Were you asked to visit that site? If so, by whom were you asked to "visit" and argue with me, Jose? Senator Bob? Were you humiliated at losing a debate with me, Jose? Want a rematch? Can you identify the person (or persons) using the name "Manohla Dargis" to write articles for the New York Times, Mr. Ginarte? If so, what is the real name of that person? Mary Marban, Esq.? Are you, Jose Ginarte, "Manohla Dargis"? Are you aware of whether persons at the Times were bribed to publish this person's articles, Mr. Ginarte? Can you, Mr. Ginarte, identify the persons committing cybercrimes against me? Will you please name those persons? ("'The Reader' : A Movie Review" and "'Revolutionary Road': A Movie Review" then "What is it like to be plagiarized?")

This morning I was unable to read my essay examining the rationality of religious belief, as I say, because obstructions and interference prevented my doing so. I cannot say, at this time, what harm has been done to that essay or other writings at these blogs today. I cannot determine how many more texts will be altered, disfigured, or destroyed, maybe stolen by a person who will be paid for my copyrighted words. ("What is it like to be plagiarized?" and "'Brideshead Revisited': A Movie Review.")

I cannot say when or whether my book will be sent to on-line booksellers. ("How Censorship Works in America" and, again, "What is it like to be plagiarized?")

I also cannot say how many short stories or other creative works by me have been vandalized. I do not know whether "errors" continue to be inserted in my writings this morning as I type these words. I cannot know whether these cybercrimes and violations of civil rights involve mafia figures or current investigations in Bergen County, New Jersey. I would not be surprised to make such a discovery. ("Senator Bob Loves Xanadu!" and "More Mafia Figures Arrested in New Jersey and New York.")

I surmise that one important feature of these torments is the pleasure they afford to torturers who delight in seeing me make corrections dozens of times. Many apathetic observers are required for such cruelty and illegality to unfold over such a long period of time with no consequences for torturers. Beyond anger, I feel disgust and revulsion for torturers, censors, and their enablers. Only in New Jersey is such repellent evil not surprising. ("What is it like to be tortured?")

Hatred of intelligence and good writing or beauty is translated into attempts to destroy both writings and writers -- out of sick envy, perhaps. What you hate, Gil, is freedom and intelligence. These are things that you cannot have because you live in the hideous prison of your moral squalor and you always will. I pity you. At least, you chose your marriage partner well to match your character and personality. I wonder whether these persons, Mr. Ginarte and Mr. Garcia, were involved in the plagiarisms of my writings or thefts from my law office? Jennifer Velez may know the answer to that question. Perhaps others also know the answer to these questions. (One last time: "What is it like to be plagiarized?" then "Censorship and Cruelty in New Jersey" and "What is it like to be censored in America?")

I am sure that persons made to suffer from a distance by sadists enjoying anonymity and political protection (Mr. Tuchin) provide a sexual thrill for twisted torturers who find victims "interesting." Mary Anne, does this ring a bell? People like Tuchin, Rabner, Poritz, Moses, Milgram -- fill me with great sadness and feelings of despair at the human condition. How can Jews condone or be a part of dehumanization less than a century after the Holocaust? Is it blindness? Ignorance? Amnesia? These are today's guilty bystanders. ("Drawing Room Comedy: A Philosophical Essay in the Form of a Film Script.")

This continuing spectacle of censorship, cruelty, suppressions of speech, delight in tormenting a dissident intellectual ("intellectual" just means a "student") says everything that is most terrible about contemporary America. What did you know Senator Menendez? When did you know it? Mr. Christie, how much more do you need to see? Ms. Dow? It never happened or allegations of "delusion" are not going to be very persuasive given the overwhelming evidence of cybercrime at these blogs. ("What is like to be tortured?")

I will try over the next few weeks and months -- at the cost of new work that I might be doing -- to discover the essays that have been altered or damaged in order to make necessary repairs. I appreciate that the goal of this process, as I have learned from careful study of these techniques, is to "drive the victim crazy." Anxiety and stress through frustrations are deeply harmful to persons. However, persons are often capable of great resistance and resilience for a moral purpose. I have learned this lesson also from Dietrich Bonhoeffer and many others. I will not get tired. I hope that you won't either. ("An Open Letter to My Torturers in New Jersey, Terry Tuchin and Diana Lisa Riccioli.")

I do not believe that you will succeed in preventing me from reading, writing, thinking and experiencing art. If necessary, I will spend the rest of my life searching for the persons responsible for these tortures in order to ensure that they will be punished for their crimes:

There may be satisfaction in being cruel to a dog, but it is a lesser satisfaction than being cruel to a human being, especially when that human being is sharply aware of what is happening and why. Ideally, the torturers ... would like to take a Shakespeare, a Goethe, an Einstein -- with intellect bright and faculties unimpaired -- and reduce him to a shrieking mass of flesh and brain tissue.

Torture is the great equalizer for mediocrities. Right, Edgar Navarrete? Remember that, to a stupid person, someone of average intelligence -- you can decide whether that includes me -- is an Einstein. For the evil individual, a normally decent person is offensive and hypocritical:

Evidently the Party [C.I.A.? OAE?] uses techniques learnt from Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany to induce states of hopelessness -- "You'll never see her again!" -- and emptiness, out of which the voluntary confession of crimes uncommitted and the postures of maudlin repentance will come. And Room 101 represents the crude ultimate in mechanistic terrorization, for the 'worst thing in the world' cannot be withstood, no matter what the inner resources of the sufferer. The technique depends on irrationality, the reflex response to a stimulus which varies from subject to subject -- rats for Winston, [in Orwell's 1984,] snakes or black beetles or the noise of fingernails on velvet for another, the materials of terror chosen after loving consideration of idiosyncratic phobias. ...

Anthony Burgess, "Clockwork Oranges," in 1985 (London: Arrow Books, 1978), p. 85.

Any more "errors" to be inserted in my writings? ("Psychological Torture in the American Legal System.")