No More Cover-Ups and Lies, Chief Justice Rabner!

July 27, 2010 at 11:31 A.M. One letter deleted overnight from a single word. I have "restored" that deleted letter to the word.

July 26, 2010 at 7:30 P.M. From a public computer: "Errors" inserted and corrected. Come on, Big Stu. Insert some more "errors."

July 25, 2010 at 11:06 A.M. "Errors" inserted in a number of essays have been corrected. I wonder whether Dennis Robinson, Esq. of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission has visited my sites? ("Dennis Overbye"?) I wonder how well Dennis-the-menace knows Alex Booth? I wonder whether either of those "gentlemen" can shed some light on the "events" at these blogs? "Green Acres," Alex? Mr. Robinson, do you or your organization have friends in the media? Are you or your political "friends" affiliated in any way with The New York Times/CBS, The New Yorker, or other publications in the New York Metropolitan area? What happened to the independence of the media, Mr. Remnick? ("Barack Obama and 'The New Yorker.'")

If two days pass without new writing from me, it means that I have been censored or that I am being prohibited from writing. I trust that persons in Cuba and elsewhere in the world are witnesses to this spectacle. ("Time to End the Embargo Against Cuba.")

An essay dealing with the Xanadu matter is coming up. Attempts to discredit "blogs" will not be very effective against these essays since each of them is supported by solid research in many "objective" sources. I have reason to hope that persons from many parts of the world are following these events attentively.

David Kaiser & Lovisa Stannow, "The Rape of American Prisoners," in The New York Review of Books, March 11, 2010, at p. 16. (New Jersey leads the pack on the subject of rapes of incarcerated women and racist prison policies. "America's Holocaust." Perhaps Lynne Stewart will be raped in prison?)
Bob Ingle & Sandy McClure, The Soprano State: New Jersey's Culture of Corruption (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2008), entirety.
Colin Moynihan, "12 Years in Prison for $292 MILLION Theft," in The New York Times, July 16, 2010, at p. A22. (Investors in N.J. and N.Y. affected by lawyer's thievery. How's Mr. Garcia doing? Ms. Kricko? Did Lynn Stewart steal $292 MILLION?)
Anahad O'Connor, "Two Police Officers Accused of Lying About Searches," in The New York Times, July 16, 2010, at p. A22. (OAE lawyers think nothing of this sort of trifle in their own efforts to get rid of radical lawyers for political bosses.)
John Eligion, "Heftier Term for Lawyer in Terrorism Case," in The New York Times, July 16, 2010, at p. A22. (Lynne Stewart gets more time because of her expressed opinions. Has Ms. Stewart been disbarred? Mr. Ginarte? Mr. Menendez?)
"Judge Reprimanded in Death Row Case," in The New York Times, July 16, 2010, at p. A20. (Improperly closed courthouse door to death row appeal may have resulted in execution of an innocent man. This judge will not be disbarred or charged with any crime. "The Life and Death of David Gale.")
Kareem Fahim, "Death in Police Encounter Stirs Calls for Changes in Egypt," in The New York Times, July 16, 2010, at p. A4. (The people are furious at our "allied local government" as corrupt fascists in Cairo? "Meyer Lansky's Whore House" is Union City, New Jersey -- allegedly. Only one new "error" inserted? You can do better, Mr. Rabner. Is criticism by Mr. Holder of Cairo's police an attack against the Egyptian government which is no worse than New Jersey's mafia government?) Shaila Dewan, "Calls for Justice Sets Off a Debate: The New Black Panthers Join the Outcry Over a Killing," in The New York Times, July 17, 2010, at p. A11. (Lynchings in 2010. Mr. Obama, where is your Justice Department?)

Among the frightening recent developments in American public life is a tendency to demonize defense counsel. It is assumed that anyone willing to defend "evil" people, like terrorists, must also be evil.

The obligation to provide a defense to every person is about your Constitutional rights. Keeping the government honest -- or as honest as possible -- within the boundaries of law is how everyone's rights are protected in a democracy. Just ask Maria Noto, Esq. ("Stuart Rabner and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")

It should be necessary to prove someone's guilt before public officials and lawyers slander the person behind-his-back to family members and friends, steal from him, or assault and rape him, right Stuart? You should not be permitted to recruit employees, friends, and family members of a person to spy on him before any accusations are invented against your target. What do you say, John, at the OAE? Are you "cooperating," John? Has the OAE's John McGill been disbarred? (Again: "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System.")

The Lynn Stewart case suggests a desire for revenge on the part of prosecutors and (sure enough) behind-the-back, outside-the-boundaries of law efforts to destroy someone which are nearly identical to what I have experienced in my life. This is to say nothing of daily computer crime, censorship, and other fruits of a conspiracy to violate civil rights in breach of federal criminal laws. Prosecutors will not forgive defense counsel who actually oppose their efforts to convict defendants. That's probably why they went after F. Lee Bailey. ("Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")

More defense lawyers, especially those lawyers who call for investigation of torture and other crimes committed by the Bush/Cheney administration -- which Mr. Obama, for understandable political reasons, is reluctant to investigate -- will be destroyed in the months to come. This apathy is a terrible mistake by the Obama administration which will be judged harshly by history for inaction in response to new forms of slavery.

"We will not sacrifice fundamental values," Mr. Obama said, "for the sake of expediency." Were Mr. Obama's fingers crossed when he made this statement? Was New Jersey's tainted legal system excluded from this contention? I hope not.

Punishing Ms. Stewart for STATEMENTS made concerning her case chills First Amendment rights not only for Ms. Stewart, but for press members and infringes on the public's right to know or obtain access to vital information.

Persecution of an individual beyond jurisdictional limitations because of opinions or values, or a refusal to legitimate injustices and crimes by which that person has been victimized, is unconstitutional. I will never legitimate your atrocities, New Jersey. I don't care how many friends you have at The New York Times, Ms. Milgram, or at Time magazine, Mr. Diaz-Balart. (Again: "Terry Tuchin, Diana Lisa Riccioli, and New Jersey's Agency of Torture.")

Furthermore, such a policy of secret vendettas by government officials is criminal abuse of authority which cannot be permitted to go unpunished in a free society. You do not get to commit crimes against another person because you are a cop, or because you do not like that person's opinions, values, or personal appearance, nor because you happen to work for the tainted OAE in Trenton. Conspiracies to violate civil rights through state censorship are still illegal in America. Calling friends who are police officers or government workers in another state to harass an individual by acting secretly on his life is criminal abuse of power. Right, Larry? ("New Jersey's Office of Attorney Ethics.")

New Jersey has used such tactics, combined with more behind-the-back slanders, economic harms, thefts, usually through intimidating family members and friends of a victim targeted in such illegal ways -- including persons, like me, living outside the state for ten years or more. The disgusting organized crime and crooked legal establishment of the Garden State have enjoyed unfettered opportunities to violate the law for too long. I wonder who has my watch these days? Stuart? ("Law and Ethics in the Soprano State" and, again, "New Jersey's 'Ethical' Legal System" and "New Jersey's Mafia Culture in Law and Politics.")

I cannot prevent the continuing censorship, computer crime, violations of privacy taking place with the "blessings" of the Trenton mob that has resulted in the destruction, censoring, and suppression of Constitutionally protected speech. Letters will be deleted from words almost every day. Don't you want to remove a letter from one of my words, this morning? I'll be disappointed if you don't insert some "errors." ("'Inception': A Movie Review.")

Readers in America are invited to judge my writings, for themselves -- naturally, they will not be counted as visitors to this site because they do not live in the "lilly-white" suburbs with Mr. Cheney and his family -- and they can decide whether denials of earned recognition, plagiarisms, refusal of publication opportunities and daily harassments are something of which they approve for persons with minority opinions never charged with or convicted of any crimes anywhere. People in Cuba and other Latin American countries, also the Middle East, should ponder these events. ("How Censorship Works in America" and "Is Senator Menendez a Suspect in Mafia-Political Murder in New Jersey?")

"Little brown persons," perhaps, deserve such treatment from their self-styled "superiors," like good-old Stuart Rabner. No doubt Mr. Margolis of the U.S. Justice Department approves of such methods of "population control" for the little people. ("Deborah T. Poritz and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey" and "Sybil R. Moses and Conduct Unbecoming to the Judiciary in New Jersey.")

Is it all "relative," Sybil? Despite the daily vandalisms and the emotional cost to me of necessary writing efforts, I believe that my writing compares well with the amazing prose I find in "elite" newspapers and magazines in America. This is certainly true of the reviews I have seen (so far) of "Inception." I will look to see whether future reviews will borrow -- without acknowledgment -- from my comments on that movie. ("What is it like to be plagiarized?" and "'Brideshead Revisited': A Movie Review.")

Billions, like me, are relegated to silence as our ideas are stolen by American media "elites" as the corporate media serves as a spear carrier for establishment politicians. ("Trenton's Nasty Lesbian Love-Fest!" and "What is it like to be censored in America?" then "Not One More Victim.")

I am heartened by the suggestion that my writings are reaching an audience outside of America where the press may be more free or at least not in the hands of so small a group of "like-minded" people subject to political or monetary "influence." ("More Censorship and Cybercrime" and "David Denby is Not Amused.")

Plagiarism of my work suggests envy of my writings and some possibility that my essays are not so bad. Mary Anne Kricko, Esq., can you shed any light on these mysteries? Have you visited my sites, Mary Anne, and have you (or someone you know) inserted "errors" in my writings? These are criminal actions, especially for any attorney or ex-attorney and soon accused felon, perhaps. Guadalupe Casillas, Esq. -- any thoughts? Heloisa? Or is it Louisa? ("Corrupt Law Firms, Senator Bob, and New Jersey Ethics.")

Mr. Rabner, do you not recognize the threat to and undermining of the few remnants of legitimacy of your state's bemerded legal system through sanctioned and very public criminality as well as censorship by "officers of the court" and legal officials, over a period of years, even when it is aimed against little-old me? Why is raping and stealing from me legally and ethically just fine, Stuart? Do you wish to speak to me of ethics, Stuart? How much do you need, Stuart? Do you want twenty- or fifty-dollars bills? It is time to end the cover-up. Give my regards to Mr. Prisco, Big Stu. Enjoy the watch. ("Is America's Legal Ethics a Lie?")